Macquarie Network ::: 2GB | 2CH | LIVENEWS | RUGBYLEAGUELIVE | WHAT CAREER | AMAZING AUSTRALIANS :::
Friday, 29 August 2008

Howard’s Team: 70% Liberal officials and lawyers

23/10/2007 7:36:00 AM.  | Tim Brunero
The Liberals love their scare campaign slogan ‘70 per cent of the Labor frontbench are ex-union officials’. So does this mean their own ministry is by contrast made up of a wildly diverse group of Australians? Well no actually – they’re 70 per cent ex-Liberal party officials and cashed up right wing lawyers. Many have spent their working lives sticking up for big business.

Let’s take a closer look:

John Howard: liberal party official and solicitor.

Peter Costello: barrister who’s most famous victory was a ground breaking union busting action called the ‘Dollar Sweet’s Case’.

Alexander Downer: adviser to Liberal Prime Minister Malcolm Fraser. Later Director of the Australian Chamber of Commerce an anti union Employer representative body.

Tony Abbott: adviser to the Leader of the Opposition John Hewson. Later Executive Director of conservative lobby group Australians for Constitutional Monarchy.

Julie Bishop: solicitor and managing partner of Clayton Utz a notoriously right wing law firm (the Prime Minister’s daughter works there).

Joe Hockey: Liberal student politician, advisor to a Liberal Premier. He was also a lawyer.

Christopher Pyne: advisor to Liberal Senator Amanda Vanstone and solicitor.

Andrew Robb: advisor to the National Farmers' Federation an anti union Employer representative body. Later he became Chief of Staff to the Leader of the Opposition Andrew Peacock and later still was Federal Director of the Liberal Party.

Bruce Billson: adviser to Liberal State Minister and later an adviser to a Federal Liberal Minister.

Nick Minchin: Liberal party official and solicitor.

Philip Ruddock: solicitor.

Helen Coonan: barrister.

Dr Brendan Nelson: President of the Australian Medical Association - basicly the doctors union.

Kevin Andrews: barrister and associate of a conservative Supreme Court judge.

Chris Ellison: barrister.

Peter McGauran: barrister.

Malcolm Turnbull: barrister.

David Johnston: barrister.

George Brandis: barrister.

Eric Abetz: barrister.

So you do the maths. That’s 16 lawyers and 8 former Liberal Party advisors. The Liberals talk about how only 20% or 1.9 million members of the workforce are unionized – and therefore Labor’s union heavy front bench is unrepresentative. Well what percentage of Australians are ex Liberal Party officials or barristers? Less than 1.9 million, that’s for sure. So who’s the more unrepresentative?

And why isn’t the Labor Party spelling this out to us? Because I can guarantee John Howard isn’t going to stop going on about the unions.

COMMENTS

Tuesday, 23 October 2007

I just want to comment on the alarmist news item yesterday "21 cities to be metres under water". When are we going to wake up to the manipulation by the media and the environ mental(sic) lobby. Does nobody look at alternative information, we are prepared to debate mulesing and criticise studies that decry its use. Yet we let the media and the enviroidiots convince us otherwise. have a llok at The Great Global Warning Swindle video done by Channel 4 UK, very enlightening.

Posted by: David Miller, Sydney

 

Tuesday, 23 October 2007

I've been waiting for this so much - thank you. fantastic, i was getting so sick of howard's bloody '70 percent unionists line'. and i've heard people repeating it down the club. now i'll be pulling out hte real stats. great work. bloody corporate lawyers and tory party hacks - fantastic

Posted by: Gary Hennessey, Parramatta

 

Tuesday, 23 October 2007

I've never read such obvious propaganda. How can you compare a high order qualification like being a lawyer to being a union bully boy? These people are talented and went out there and got a high order qualification - like do you know what it takes adn what it costs to become a barrister?

Posted by: S Hiden, Hoxton Park

 

Tuesday, 23 October 2007

well well well. what a welcome news flash - those holier than thou Liberals bagging the opposition - turns our they're all corporate lawyers and agents of big business. bet none of them ever said now to representing corporations against working families. you can't compare their shameful conduct with that off the unionist - who earn next to nothing and fight against the man their whole life.

Posted by: Heidi Hilton, Bonnet Bay

 

Tuesday, 23 October 2007

Sorry but aren't you forgetting that most union reps are lawyers - they've just traded the pin striped suits and riches for justice.

Posted by: Unis Garrington, Guildford

 

Tuesday, 23 October 2007

We don't want union hacks running the show ok? it's very simple, hte labor party has changed - i mean chifley was a train driver - the new ranks are made up of time servers and hacks. get real. the liberal party just has some high achievers that's all - that should be applauded

Posted by: H Brooke, Camperdown

 

Tuesday, 23 October 2007

What this article failed to mention was that most of the front bench of the Liberals are millionaries. millionaries! and multi millionaires at that. Turnbull is worth $150 million! these guys only care about the rich. we need to see that. they represent like 4% of the population.

Posted by: Glen Harris, North Curl Curl

Wednesday, 24 October 2007

And Mr. Rudd???? Just how many millions does he have... I've lost count!

Posted by: Lol J, Sydney

 

Tuesday, 23 October 2007

Don't hate people for being successful. being in a uion is not success. it is feeding off the hard work of others. unions are blood suckers, hustlers and bullies.

Posted by: Ben Kim, Cremorne

 

Tuesday, 23 October 2007

is this really a surprise - is this news? of course they are anti-union professionals. everyone knows that. that's why the electorate is rejecting the liberals isn't it? they are sick of hte lies and smears and half truths

Posted by: Peter Poulos, Lakemba

Tuesday, 23 October 2007

The people must keep little Johnnie and his friends in power - he says things are good - so they must be....

Posted by: And Mac,

 

Tuesday, 23 October 2007

Both partys have way too many people with little experience of the real world. Personally I would prefer someone that has spent time concerned with the working conditions of ordinary Australians over a spoilt rich kid that thinks they are born to rule.

Posted by: Rob Byrne, Springwood

 

Tuesday, 23 October 2007

Tim Brunero is your typical hater. The man has achieved little apart from going on Big Brother and that gives him the right to criticise other. Amazing!

Posted by: Timmy d'Tosser, Surry Hills

Tuesday, 23 October 2007

And what gives you the right you moron? You are an obvious Howard sympathiser and you've copied his tactics - playing the man not the ball. You attack Tim but not what he says, therefore you say nothing of substance. I bet you are a former union official! ;-)

Posted by: Frederick Houston, Freemantle

 

Tuesday, 23 October 2007

I would much rather the highly qualifiled talent of Solicitors and Barristers at the helm of Australias 1 Trillion dollar economy than a bunch of union hacks. Thats why all Labor governments have a history of destroying the economy.

Posted by: Peter Rees, Hoxton Park

 

Tuesday, 23 October 2007

Sorry if i'm naive but i always assumed politicians had been fairly partisan their whole lives. and of course they do jobs that allow them to be partisan - it gives them experience in the rhetoric and also gives them the contacts to move forward.

Posted by: Jose sulliman, Mosman

 

Tuesday, 23 October 2007

SHAME HOWARD SHAME

Posted by: SALLY gills, rydalmere

 

Tuesday, 23 October 2007

If a lawyer wanted to join the Labor party there would be no problem - no matter who they worked for, however if a trade union official wanted to join the Liberal party there would be hell to pay. Your argument does not make sense. Do you hate people because they have made a success of themselves? Is it a crime to make money? The real difference between the Coalition front bench and Labor is that the Libs have made it in the world on their own talent and drive.

Posted by: Pete Mulligan, North Sydney

 

Tuesday, 23 October 2007

What do you call 100 lawyers at the bottom of the ocean ? answer a GOOD Start . The Coalition claims that they have the experience to run our economy & lead our country to a brighter future ? maybe their right if we were living like Alice in Wonderland. In John Howard we have the greatest spin doctor of all time. An accomplished teller of lies, half truths and is a vessle full of empty promises. No wonder he surrounds him self with lawyers. You are what you preach. THAT"S POLITICAL EXPERIENCE.

Posted by: John Vlasnik, Liverpool

 

Tuesday, 23 October 2007

You missed much of the CV's of these MP's to give a biased idea of their experience which include Tony Abbott: A Rhodes Scholar – trained as a priest – Journalist – feature writer for the Bulletin Julie Bishop: managing partner of Clayton Utz Has business management experience Andrew Robb: BEc (Hons)(La Trobe), Dip AgricSc (Dookie Agricultural College). Animal health officer, Dept of Agriculture (Vic) 1972-74; agricultural economist 1974-79. Part-time tutor, La Trobe University 1976-79. Econo

Posted by: Geoffrey Brown, Ourimbah

Wednesday, 24 October 2007

yeah right geoff like there wasn't selective editing by the liberals to shut out every other bit of work experience of the labor party people? i'm sure one or two worked at McDonalds or at a club or milk bar - how come that wasn't refered to? Why wasn't it '70% of hte labor front bench are ex paper boys'?

Posted by: Clarence Hardgraves, Rhodes

 

Wednesday, 24 October 2007

Ditto to Geoffrey of Ourimbah. This article has plainly left off the other experience of those who have also worked within the party. you couldn't do that to the Labor Union Hacks in Rudd's dismal team, because you would be left with a void. And don't forget, Maxine McKew is marriage to a professional union hack.

Posted by: Vanessa Crago, Berowra

Wednesday, 24 October 2007

sorry but you're wrong. of course the ex union officials on the labor front bench have done other things - but the liberals have tarred them based on that one job. grow up.

Posted by: Ben Moylan, Galston

 

Wednesday, 24 October 2007

what does it matter - it's whether they can do the job. i'd rather have labor than some bunch of born to rule rich kids.

Posted by: S Tarrow, Glenbrook

 

Wednesday, 24 October 2007

The thinking of left wing loonies never cease to amaze me.It seems they actually thrive on hatred for anyone who achieves. For heaven's sake stop and THINK ! If it wasn't for the achievers who actually got somewhere in life and started employing staff you wouldn't have a job.GROW UP ! On the other hand as a liberal voter most times the fact Mr Rudd and his wife are worth millions bothers me not which makes me ask the question ,why doesn't it bother you ?

Posted by: Gary Buchanan, Revesby

 

Wednesday, 24 October 2007

Unionism is an ideology...the legal profession is not.

Posted by: Ari James, NSW

Thursday, 25 October 2007

sorry ari but most of these liberal lawyers are all corporate lawyers who happily act against workers, consumers. that is a moral/political decisions. i shouldn't have to explain these things to you.

Posted by: G Middleton, Pennant Hills

 

Wednesday, 24 October 2007

If Labor was to win the election I can almost assure you that 90 % of small to medium businesses would stop hiring in fear of the unions. (THE OLD LABOR DAYS). That would send us into recession. I would think very carefully on election day and cast your vote as a long term thing. We must get Johnny over the line at all costs.

Posted by: Ashley Fisher, Glenwood

 

Wednesday, 24 October 2007

If Labor was to win the election I can almost assure you that 90 % of small to medium businesses would stop hiring in fear of the unions. (THE OLD LABOR DAYS). That would send us into recession. I would think very carefully on election day and cast your vote as a long term thing. We must get Johnny over the line at all costs.

Posted by: Ashley Fisher, Glenwood

 

Thursday, 25 October 2007

The Libs don't understand what they have done to their campaign attacking the unions. In doing so they have put every hard working person on a wage off side with the Liberals. The union is a collective of decent people striving to better themselves with the help of the elected officials of the union. Some of these decent officials are in the Labor party as members of parliament and some are endeavoring to become members of parliament.

Posted by: Tony Saliba, Sydney

 

Thursday, 25 October 2007

I am a so-called union hack. What the Liberals forget is that that the majority of union members and officials work together as a team to help each other out in hard times. And times are hard no matter which side of politics you choose. Neither party will help me finacially because there is not much between them any more. The only reason that i will be voting Labor is that they will be safeguarding the only thing that we working class have left and that is our working conditions.

Posted by: russell woods, sydney

 
 

YOUR SAY