Macquarie Network ::: 2GB | 2CH | LIVENEWS | STREET CORNER | RUGBYLEAGUELIVE | WHAT CAREER | AMAZING AUSTRALIANS :::
Wednesday, 07 January 2009

Activists: Whaling, kangaroo cull, what's the bloody difference?

11/01/2008 6:02:00 PM.  | Neil Varcoe with Yasmin Bright

RELATED ARTICLES

LATEST FEATURES

Animal activists today held a macabre protest at the Japanese consulate, likening Australia’s commercial cull of kangaroos to the Japanese whale harvest.

The protesters, some of which were dressed as Kangaroos and were mock-executed by men brandishing firearms, stated: "Japan slaughters whales – Australia slaughters Kangaroos – What’s the bloody difference?"

Animal Liberation staged the protest in opposition to the Revised Code of Conduct for the Human Killing of Kangaroos.

The revised code states that orphaned joeys must be shot.

Angie Stevenson, project manager for the group, said commercial kangaroo culls are responsible for the “largest wildlife massacre in the world,” and the change to include killing ‘young-at-foot’ joeys will wipe the next generation of the native animal off the planet.

“Of the total commercial kangaroo kill, 25 per cent are females with young-at-foot joeys,” she said.

“The next generation of kangaroos are about to be wiped off the face of the earth due to this new code.”

The group has called for a blanket ban on the killing of female kangaroos.

The protest also included a DVD drop.

The vision obtained by LIVENEWS.com.au shows graphic images of kangaroos being slaughtered.

One image depicts a child, who looks to be around eight years old, repeatedly beating a baby kangaroo against the side of a vehicle, after it was found in the pouch of its dead mother.

The child wields the animal like a baseball bat and takes around five swings until the small animal hangs loose in his hand, obviously deceased.

LIVENEWS.com.au has provided excerpts of the brutal video, but warns the content is graphic, and may offend some users.

We are also awaiting comment on the issue from NSW Farmer’s Federation Association President Jock Laurie.

COMMENTS

Friday, 11 January 2008

Mmmm - this is a difficult one. For those that believe that killing animals is wrong - there is obviously no difference. However, the vast majority do believe that killing for culling or food is acceptable. I also think most people believe that any animal that is killed must be slaughtered in THE MOST humane way possible. Beating a joey is clearly not acceptable. From my understanding though, there is one very big difference between roos and whales, one is a pest and one is no where near that.

Posted by: Concerned Liberal, Minto

Tuesday, 15 January 2008

To me this is a no-brainer. The number of kangaroos out here, outback NSW has declined by huge amounts. I live in outback NSW and I know a few kangaroo shooters, therefore I know that Kangaroo shooters do not kill all their 'prey' instantly and humanely, often only injuring them and allowing them to die slowely, often they take their children and mates out to 'hunt'. It is appalling to me that we allow this barbaric industry to continue.

Posted by: Denise Singleton, Broken Hill

Sunday, 26 October 2008

Kangaroos are not a pest. There are no studies proving this myth. Check out http://www.environment.gov.au/soe/2006/publications/drs/indicator/162/index.html - grazing pressure of kangaroos is only 1-8% compared to cows (61-68%) and sheep (29-31%). Here is a CSIRO study showing that kangaroos are no threat to sheep: http://www.publish.csiro.au/paper/WR9740027.htm Kangaroos have been living in harmony with the earth for 16 million yrs. Man is the pest! See http://www.stopkangarookilling.org

Posted by: Menkit Prince, Uki

 

Friday, 11 January 2008

Culling is done because there are too many kangaroos, while the killing of whales is frowned upon because there are so few. Concerned Liberal, I agree, humaneness is vital and as for joeys, it's hard to say what is better. Would they survive if they were left in the wild on their own? Or would they die more painfully?

Posted by: Amy Bradney-George, Brisbane

 

Friday, 11 January 2008

Have any of these activist clowns seen the plagues of roos in the outback? I think not, otherwise they wouldn't be so worried about a commercial cull. At least we don't hide behind the "scientific purposes" angle the Japanese use!

Posted by: Rod Penna, Kadina

Sunday, 26 October 2008

Rod Penna: Sadly none of the tourist 'clowns' can find any of these hordes and plagues of kangaroos in the outback though they travel half way around the world to see these magnificent animals. All they can find are ones in zoos. Wake UP! Kangaroos are on track to extinction. See http://www.stopkangarookilling.org and learn the reasons why before it's too late then sign the moratorium petition at http://www.gopetition.com/petitions/kangaroo-extinction.html

Posted by: Menkit Prince, Uki

 

Friday, 11 January 2008

What is the agenda of the activists? Who pays them? We have had miximotosis for rabbits. To save farms. And 1080 dingo baiting. To save sheep. Do we protect roos and not farms? Who pays for the damage done by roos?

Posted by: james stack,

 

Saturday, 12 January 2008

Ok, I'm not sure why we have to compare the two but off-hand I'd say Kangaroos are not endangered. Otherwise there isn't a lot of difference. If kangaroos are a pest and culling is necessary it shouldn't be treated like a pleasant outing for the whole family and it shouldn't involve cruelty such as beating a baby animal to death on the side of a ute. That behaviour speaks volumes about what is being taught to that child and it isn't pretty. I certainly wouldn't want him anywhere near my daughter

Posted by: jacki smith, tasmania

 

Saturday, 12 January 2008

As a person who was born & bred in the country I have never heard so much drivel in my life. Do these idiots who claim that the Kaangaroos is being wiped out have their heads on upside down.Our golf course has an estimated 3000 Roos. If they are being wiped out how come so many cause so much damage to vehicles in accidents.The arere many more Roos in our Country than people so the Liberationists should shut up & get real. By the way,I don't know of any benefit Roos contribute to our country.

Posted by: Genuine REALIST, yamba nsw

 

Saturday, 12 January 2008

Why don't they put out a DVD of baby sheep being slaghtered for our lamb roasts and lamb chops. The killing of any animals is not pretty but its part of the `great circle' and we should not be too urked by it. Sensationalising it in this way is just a stunt. These animals are pests and reach plague numbers if uncontrolled. To say that they will be wiped out is just totally delusional.

Posted by: Jo Stalin, Sydney

 

Saturday, 12 January 2008

Kangaroos in Australia are considered a disease, a "plague" and a nuisance. Whales are symbols of successful conservation since commercial whaling was banned. In reality, they are both wildlife that are suffering slaughter for profits and both are cruel and barbaric. The Japanese are correct, and we are being racist. We need to stop persuing kangaroos. They are indigenous animals and have a right to exist. This is their country. We need to be consistent and ethical about both issues.

Posted by: Vivienne Ortega, Heidelberg Heights

 

Saturday, 12 January 2008

Kangaroos in Australia are considered a disease, a "plague" and a nuisance. Whales are symbols of successful conservation since commercial whaling was banned. In reality, they are both wildlife that are suffering slaughter for profits and both are cruel and barbaric. The Japanese are correct, and we are being racist. We need to stop persuing kangaroos. They are indigenous animals and have a right to exist. This is their country. We need to be consistent and ethical about both issues.

Posted by: Vivienne Ortega, Heidelberg Heights

 

Saturday, 12 January 2008

There is a sweeping, and uninformed comment, that Kangaroos in Australia are considered" a disease, plague and nuisance".Go live in the bush and see just how "threatened" they are. AND see the damage they cause to the land. If unculled they could wipe out grazing land FOREVER. Which means you and I would not get to buy food currently provided by the land. Most of these "rent a crowds" protesting are totally ignorant. Better idea would be to sterilise some of the males. Two legged ones too.

Posted by: colleen a, Sydney

Sunday, 20 January 2008

I agree with you and nd i would like to know how long does a kangaroo live. I would think that that would eventually even out the population of kangaroos. can you find out for me?. bobbie. It is abhorant that an adult would allow a child to kill an animal like that!

Posted by: roberta tavola, penrith

 

Saturday, 12 January 2008

So it suits the activists to compare the killing of whales (endangered) to the culling of kangaroos (not endangered). Will they be doing the same thing for cane toads, which, while not native to Australia, are often violently killed by people? Who has the double-standards here?

Posted by: Amy Bradney-George, Brisbane

Saturday, 12 January 2008

Minke whales are not endangered. That does not make their killing ethical or acceptable. Animals are more than numbers. Their healthy numbers are an indication of the health, so far, of the oceans. The seas are the domain of these wonderful animals, and humans cannot presume to "harvest" them for a resource. No wildlife killing is sustainable due to the over-heavy number of humans on the planet.

Posted by: Bob Ollie, Vic

Saturday, 12 January 2008

Bob, you might want to not that I never said the killing of animals was acceptable, that was your own inference and not what I was implying. I was simply pointing out double-standards on both sides of the table. Please read a bit more carefully if you're going to use my comments as a soapbox for you to stand on.

Posted by: Amy Bradney-George, Brisbane

 

Saturday, 12 January 2008

Doesn't anybody realise that animals (humans are animals too you know) feel emotions just like us. For example fear, have you ever been stalked or attacked and feared for your life, well if you have then you know what the animal feels when he is stalked by human predators and I would not wish that on anything, be it human, whale, kangaroo, baby joey etc. If you ask me there are too many human animals and not enough kangaroos.

Posted by: Bev Mid-north coast of NSW, Taree

 

Monday, 14 January 2008

There is ONLY one plague on this planet and that is humans. Kangaroos and Whales dont pollute we do............

Posted by: bill carson, narara

Tuesday, 15 January 2008

Absolutely agree, it is time we took a step back and realise the only animal on this planet that will destroy it is us, not kangaroos, whales or seal pups... leave them alone.

Posted by: Denise Singleton, Broken Hill

 

Thursday, 21 February 2008

Out of 51 species of macropods (Kangaroos and wallabies), 7 are commercially shot. The last census put the population of these 7 species at 50 million. In an 11 month period in NSW there were over 1000 inspections of professional shooters in the act of culling. Culling methods are endorsed by the RSPCA who says the methods are "one of the most humane methods of animal slaughter possible". Just because someone has a gun does not make them a professional shooter.

Posted by: Guido Pestoni, Sydney

Sunday, 26 October 2008

50 million? Kangaroo populations crashed nationwide up to 70% from 2001-2006. There are less than 24 million estimated (though nobody can find them and the quota is never met with kangaroos becoming regionally extinct and new areas having to be opened up). Considering there were estimated to be 200 million before the advent of white man that is a 90% reduction in numbers. As for being humane, see http://youtube.com/watch?v=zcMkNYOBvW8 Kangaroos have reached the tipping point (50% females killed)

Posted by: Menkit Prince, Uki

 

Saturday, 13 December 2008

I think (and I recomend it to others) kangaroos naturally stop populating in drought conditions and then of course they don't naturally stop dieing and then of course the drought wouldn't be kill them off as they try to eat and drink themselves into extintion.it is ever so easy to gather a load of so call facts(and we all know what a fact is I hope)wrap them in highly Emotive words and in reality there is not a grain of truth in the idea that is being espoused here

Posted by: James Dyball, Chelsea Heights

 
 

YOUR SAY




 


 

500 characters maximum. 500 characters left.


 

* Required field