Macquarie Network ::: 2GB | 2CH | LIVENEWS | STREET CORNER | RUGBYLEAGUELIVE | WHAT CAREER | AMAZING AUSTRALIANS :::
Wednesday, 07 January 2009

Jetstar's nosedive in quality

6/02/2008 4:28:00 PM.  | Tim Brunero
In the new Australia no one cares about quality. We only care about the cash. We’re not allowed to take pride in our work because we’re not about being the world’s best anymore. We’re just about satisfying faceless shareholders and miserly private equity firms.

Enter the debacle at Sydney Airport last Friday where hundreds of Jetstar passengers were left to sleep on footpaths when their flights were cancelled.

Here is an airline, like businesses in many other industries, which has shunned decency and service - and more importantly safety - just to save a dollar.

Nowhere is Australia’s world’s best practice better demonstrated than in our impeccable aviation safety record. Our national carrier, Qantas, has never had a fatal crash. Never.

Qantas is an airline that has a licensed aircraft engineer check your plane every time it lands and takes off. Guys with a minimum eight years training. These guys check for leaks, cracks, structural problems, birdstrike, and damage by baggage handlers and catering trucks. Jetstar doesn’t. They get pilots to do the job, which is a bit like getting a driver to fill in their own pink slip.

Until public opposition forced them to reverse it, Jetstar used to have an unallocated seating policy. They made passengers form an undignified scrum to get on board, pushing others out of the way to get the best seats.

On Qantas, patrons are offered meals, drinks, snacks and entertainment to make the flight more pleasant. On Jetstar they are hectored over and over to buy things.

At Qantas you can check in your baggage many hours before you fly, and if you have a few extra bags it’s no problem. At Jetstar you’re likely to be told you can’t check in early because of ‘security issues’ and directed to costly airport lockers. And it if you have extra baggage, wait to pay wads of cash for each extra kilo.

At Qantas if your late flight is cancelled they’ll get you a room in a hotel. At Jetstar you’ll be ignored.

At Jetstar the honcho, Alan Joyce, made his name at the ultimate penny pinching Irish airline, Ryanair. That airline was so tight the planes have no tray tables or blinds to save money. The man whose pay went up by 87 per cent last year to $2.66 million.

Oh, and at Jetstar don’t expect the staff to be in a good mood. Cabin staff get paid less than at Qantas. So do their pilots - they get substantially less.

Of all the complaints levelled against our carriers between 2004 and 2006 a massive 39 per cent were against Jetstar. Complaints Victorian Consumer Affairs found Jetstar had ‘shown reluctance to resolve’.

These complaints related to consumers’ ability to vary flight details, request refunds for late or cancelled flights, to obtain refunds for missed flights and the difficulty of contacting customer service centres.

And look at the small print and you’ll see that Qantas reserves the right to stick you on a Jetstar plane if they can’t get you there on one of their own.

I wish I could feel confident all of Jetstar’s dubious behaviour was to keep prices low. But I’m not.

I think Jetstar’s mission is all about intimidating unionised Qantas workers. It’s about slowly fazing out Qantas of some routes, and turning them over to Jetstar. It’s about saving the parent company money.

Qantas is not interested in being a world leader anymore. About having the proudest name and employees in the market. It’s all about making money – even if they have to set up another dodgy brand to do it.

If only this trend were only in aviation. But it’s not. Across industries, in power generation, in transport and a host of others we’re substituting service quality for profit quantity.

Pride of ownership with suicidal short term pragmatics.

Good solid jobs with a fair work/life balance with three-month contracts and AWA’s.

And when the private equity firms have made their bucks and have long since shifted their funds and moved onto new plunder - who will it be who really pays?

COMMENTS

Wednesday, 06 February 2008

Tim, I agree with what you have said. I also had a few bad experiences with Jetstar, typically involving changing route/refund, etc. However they showed me the ticket condition was just that-not allowing changing route/refund, I have nothing to say! The moral of the story is: you get what you pay for! If you don't like these restrictions don't fly with Jetstar. They are just that - low cost airline, and it's not reasonable to expect extras similar to full fare airlines from them at that price!

Posted by: W O, Turramurra

 

Wednesday, 06 February 2008

Tim. Let the buyer beware. If you don't like Jet Star service then use another airline. Nobody is forced to use them. Its a free market. If they are not putting out a value product at the price asked then they will fail. Really not worth an editorial Tim. Don't think you can ignite any conspiracy theories here!

Posted by: Geoff Bolton, Lane Cove

Wednesday, 06 February 2008

What a silly billy little willy you are Mr. Geof Bolton, buyer beware indeed in an industry where you can't possibly be aware of what it is you are to be beware of, particularly when you are cocooned from airport lounge to aeroplane seat. You are one who having learned a phrase bully others with it foolishly. Well spotted Tim you are on the money once more also their pilots pay their own new aircraft upgrade training, Mr. Geof Bolton no doubt believes that is fair reasonable and safe also.

Posted by: Fredericko Phernakaphan, Balmain

Thursday, 07 February 2008

Fred, to some extent the statement of let buyer beware is true. Using my example below the passenger has the responsibility to read the terms and conditions before purchasing the ticket. This should avoid any "nasty" surprises when dealing with the airline. Indeed if the airline does not provide good value for money and safety, it will evantually be priced out and eliminated out of the market by the public. A low cost airline shouldn't be expected to provide 1st class service.

Posted by: W O, Turramurra

Thursday, 07 February 2008

Fred, just don't use JetStar. Don't complain, vote with your feet. Go elsewhere. An "idiot" is defined as someone who does the same thing but expects different outcomes. Don't fall into that trap!

Posted by: Geoff Bolton, Lane Cove

 

Wednesday, 06 February 2008

Go Tim, You are right on the mark with this article. This airline was formed purely to smash the unions but the result is a lower standard of safety. I refuse to fly with Qantas ever since the started this campaign, it permiates through the whole organisation and in aviation a lack of pride in your work can kill lots of people. I wouldn't want anyone I loved flying on Jetstar.

Posted by: Graeme Henderson,

 

Wednesday, 06 February 2008

Don't forget that the great safety record of Qantas survived by pure luck the other week when the sink overflowed and killed all the generators, much further out from landing and it would have been all over red rover. Airlines that rely on luck to make there landings don't hold onto their safety records for long. The new Qantas with it's cheap off-shore maintainence agenda is not the same airline that has been operating for all these decades, it's a safety record is just since privatisation.

Posted by: Graeme Henderson,

Thursday, 07 February 2008

Here here....

Posted by: Annabel Regina, Freshwater

 

Wednesday, 06 February 2008

I do agree with what you are saying but on the other hand I have flown with Jetstar more than 5 times from the start of last year and I have NEVER had one problem with the airline or the staff. It all depends whether you're a picky passenger who is not easily pleased. And its right, You do get what you pay for. If you pay discount rates, one should not expect 1st class service.

Posted by: Liz Henriquez, Perth

 

Wednesday, 06 February 2008

QANTAS has indeed had a fatal accident - do your research and get your facts right!

Posted by: Mark Benson, Sydney

Thursday, 07 February 2008

Mark Benson - out of curriosity can you tell me when and where becasue i didn't know about this!

Posted by: Concerned Liberal, Minto

 

Wednesday, 06 February 2008

I hate to admit it but I agree with GH but without the conspiracy theories attached.Some Jetstar passangers get to fly on Qantas planes, the funny thing is the Qantas passangers get all the meals & drinks etc & the Jetstar passangers beside them get nothing.The worrying thing is Qantas are pushing more & more Jetstar flights on us by removing Qantas flights from the closer routes. Like they say; you pay peanuts.There is rarely a week goes by that Ray Hadley doesn't get a complaint about them.

Posted by: James H, Sydney

Thursday, 07 February 2008

James H. My view is, if you don't like JetStar then don't use them. Take the alternative. No one is forcing you. Go with Virgin or Tiger. Or pay more and go with Qantas. Shouldn't even be a discussion!

Posted by: Geoff Bolton, Lane Cove

Thursday, 07 February 2008

Yes, and if Jetstar does not get their act together they will not survive the competition. As simple as that if we all vote with our feet. Simple logic.

Posted by: W O, Turramurra

Thursday, 07 February 2008

Geoff; Just because I happened to agree with GH on something that is no reason to treat me like him. I was the passenger who was getting the food. I do a lot of flying with my job & I refuse to fly Jetstar full stop. One main reason is I need to get to my destination to meet my appointment. Jetstar can't be relied upon to do that. Neither can Virgin; they down size planes on a regular basis without notice so 1/3 of the passengers have to catch the next plane . You basically get what you pay for.

Posted by: James H, Sydney

Thursday, 07 February 2008

Jim H. Yep, you've made the choice that fits your needs. I just get tired of people taking "cheap" flights and the complaining about the service. You get what you pay for. Didn't mean to upset you!

Posted by: Bolts Bolton, Lane Cove

Thursday, 07 February 2008

Bolts, perhaps the lefties got so used to get something for nothing, hence they complains about the lack of service Jetstar provided given the pityful airfare they have paid?

Posted by: W O, Turramurra

 

Wednesday, 06 February 2008

It's funny because many people in melb don't realise when they fly in that jetstar doesn't fly to tullermarine (like everyone else) but to avalon which is close to geelong. It's way out to buggery!! They get quite tight lipped after the $100 cab fare to the city which wipes out any saving they might have enjoyed on their ticket.

Posted by: Sally Jessup, Dandenong

 

Thursday, 07 February 2008

http://www.livenews.com.au/Articles/2008/01/11/Cracks_discovered_in_numerous_Qantas_jets I'm glad they found these.....(before ever take off and after every landing... cracks just form overnight i suppose... "Qantas is an airline that has a licensed aircraft engineer check your plane every time it lands and takes off. Guys with a minimum eight years training. These guys check for leaks, cracks, structural problems, birdstrike, and damage by baggage handlers and catering trucks"

Posted by: jack bnimble, Sydney

 

Thursday, 07 February 2008

When you fly to Melbourne with Jetstar you go to Avalon airport (near geelong) and not tullamarine. It costs you so much time and money to get to the city it is scarcely worth any kind of saving.

Posted by: Emma Banyar, St Peters

Thursday, 07 February 2008

Emma. Don't complain, just don't use Jetstar. You pay the money then you make the choice. But don't expect first class service on a budget airline. The Europeans got used to this years ago.

Posted by: geoff bolton, Lane Cove

Thursday, 07 February 2008

How foolish you are Emma complaining, making all of us aware of what it is we are to be beware of, be like Mr. Geof Bolton, and be aware of what to be beware of without credible awareness, now you see how foolish you are?

Posted by: Fredericko Phernakaphan, Balmain

 

Thursday, 07 February 2008

Bolts, You are a passionate defender of Jetstar and yet your only defence seems to be to tell people not to complain? Now you complain all the time about all sorts of things but Jetstar seems to deserve immunity, do you have connections with this airline, are you a shareholder or have you some other vested interest?

Posted by: Graeme Henderson,

Thursday, 07 February 2008

Henderson. Are you illiterate? All my entries say "Don't use Jetstar". How is that supporting them??

Posted by: Geoff Bolton, Lane Cove

Thursday, 07 February 2008

Really Bolts? It looks more like you are teying to shut down the discussion, I mean you say that "Shouldn't even be a discussion!" and yet you have commented 5 times, more than anyone else at this point, that is seriously illogical.

Posted by: Graeme Henderson,

 

Thursday, 07 February 2008

Well Tim its true that qantas has never had a jet crash fatality but I think youll find they certainly have crashed planes with fatalities particularly prior to world war 2

Posted by: mike Pynt, Artarmon

 

Thursday, 07 February 2008

What everyone is forgetting is that Jetstar is Qantas, it is just a clever trick to reduce the overall costs of the airline itself, where are the Jetstar shares, there aint any because it's a subsiduary of Qantas. Be careful claiming that Qantas is better in every way to Jetstar that's not it, they are just planning the new airline structure under the cost saving banner of Jetstar, eventually they will reduce Qantas to a drip and pour all their money into Jetstar, it's cheaper....

Posted by: Rob Green, Sydney

Thursday, 07 February 2008

Sorry Rob, you just don't understand the market! There is a position for "quality" products, ie Qantas competes with Singapore Airlines, BA etc etc. There is a market for "budget" carriers. Qantas needs to be in BOTH markets. To abdicate the premium/profitable market would be suicide for Qantas. No conspiracy, just a fact! Read "Marketing 101"

Posted by: Geoff Bolton, Lane Cove

Thursday, 07 February 2008

Rob, indeed Jetstar is a subsidary of Qantas. However you will find that both will co-exist as they cater for different markets: Qantas for corporate & Jetstar for leisure. This has been a successful model in Europe for many years. Both airlines will cut costs & Qantas will remain a full service carrier & Jetstar will be a low cost one. The issue is people should be aware Jetstar is just that - a low cost airline, & they should vote with their feet if they are not satisfied with their service.

Posted by: W O, Turramurra

Thursday, 07 February 2008

I agree rob, but isn't that exactly what tim is saying?

Posted by: James Balaka, Telopea

Friday, 08 February 2008

James B, Tim got it wrong (he likes "conspiracies"). Refer to WO & my entry: Rob doesn't understand the market! There is a position for "quality" products, ie Qantas competes with Singapore Airlines, BA etc etc. There is a market for "budget" carriers. Qantas needs to be in BOTH markets. To abdicate the premium/profitable market would be suicide for Qantas. No conspiracy, just a fact!

Posted by: Geoff Bolton, Lane Cove

 

Thursday, 07 February 2008

Just a few random thoughts. I won't fly Jetstar into Melbourne becasause they don't fly into Tullamarine. I have flown with them before, friendly people, crap service, crap flight, but cheap - you do get what you pay for. Whether ANY ticket is refundable/ changeable or not is CLEARLY explained PRIOR to purchase - again - you pay for what you get. As for the Qantas shifting its passangers to Jetstar - that is WRONG - i didn't know that happened.

Posted by: Concerned Liberal, Minto

 

Friday, 08 February 2008

Geoff Bolton couldn't spell the word 'conspiracy' let alone define it. According to the Oxford dictionary; Secret plan to commit a crime. Perhaps that crime was in fact a conspiracy to defraud employees of their entitlements.

Posted by: Sean Ambrose, Helensburgh

Friday, 08 February 2008

Ambrose. If the employees don't like it they can walk. We have "full" employment. Stop whining and whinging.

Posted by: Geoff Bolton, Lane Cove

Friday, 08 February 2008

Sean, the word "conspiracies" spelt by Mr Geoff Bolton is the plural of the word "conspiracy" according to Oxford Dictionary. I can't see any issues with his spelling.

Posted by: W O, Turramurra

Friday, 08 February 2008

What happens when the pilot turns off the engines after a JetStar palne has landed?.......Sean Ambrose keeps whining!! If anyone can remember the correct version of this joke please let us know.

Posted by: Gary Benson, Blacktown

 

Friday, 08 February 2008

On Wednesday night Virgin Blue had to look after passengers at Sydney Airport after their flights were cancelled. The airline offered to compensate passengers $200 for accommodation costs, made sure Sydney airport stayed open and staff worked overtime handing out water and, drinks and snacks. They are a low cost airline. But they did not behave in the disgraceful manner JetStar did last week. I hope apologists for the JetStar have followed this story.

Posted by: Tim Brunero, Sydney

Friday, 08 February 2008

Tim, I suggest that you fly Virgin Blue and not Jetstar. What is the problem? You have freedom of choice, exercise it and stop complaining and generating conspiracy theories. If Jetstar is no good it will fail. I cannot understand why you create issues when there aren't any!

Posted by: Geoff Bolton, Lane Cove

Friday, 08 February 2008