Macquarie Network ::: 2GB | 2CH | LIVENEWS | STREET CORNER | RUGBYLEAGUELIVE | WHAT CAREER | AMAZING AUSTRALIANS :::
Thursday, 16 October 2008

Putting off emissions trading would cost billions: Swan

10/07/2008 9:34:00 PM.  | 
Delaying the introduction of an emissions trading scheme (ETS) would cost Australia billions of dollars, Treasurer Wayne Swan said tonight.

The federal government plans to start emissions trading in 2010 but the opposition has called for a two-year delay amid warnings the scheme could cause severe economic pain.

Mr Swan rejected the call in his speech in Sydney tonight.

"Delaying the introduction of the emissions trading scheme, as proposed by the federal opposition, would also have billions of dollars worth of adverse consequences for Australia," he told tonight's function, a 30th anniversary of the Labour Union Cooperative Retirement Fund.

Mr Swan said climate change was the most significant economic challenge of our times.

He likened emissions trading to the superannuation reforms introduced by Labor in the 1980s and 1990s in terms of the significance of economic reform.

"We should never forget that (super reform) was opportunistically opposed by our political opponents," he said.

"Today, we are at the threshold of similarly far-sighted reforms and the same opportunistic opposition."

Mr Swan said tackling climate change "would not be painless" but it was time for action.

COMMENTS

Friday, 11 July 2008

So very true, it is going to cost the Aust. taxpayer Billions in extra taxes and living cost. I did note there was a poll in the UK the other week. It was about what the Brits thought of their trading scheme, that has been in place for 3 years now. The majority thought that it did nothing for climate change and was only good for raising additional taxes for the government.

Posted by: Freddie Patt, Orange County, USA

Friday, 11 July 2008

Again, we the Poor of this nation will bare the brunt of this. we will get pushed further down the pile and be left no hope to climb up! To prove the point, look at the pay rises. $21. for those on 500/wk and 1400. for those on 8000/wk. this is a pointer at what it will cost us!Then we get morons like G.Henderson telling us how lucky we are to finally have a Labor Govt. in power? Idiots in govt telling us renewable energy will cost more? WTF!?

Posted by: Nick Again, Maryborough

Friday, 11 July 2008

So 21.3million Australians are going to suffer unless they introduce a ETS; and what about the 1.3billion Chinese and the 1.1billion Indians ? At least John Howard wasn't prepared to sacrafice us at the expense of the major polluters of China and India.

Posted by: Irwin Daley, Canberra

 

Friday, 11 July 2008

Again I say" What is the plan for the revenue raised"? No one has come out and said what it'll be used for. I am of the Opinion the Only real reason for an ETS, is the realisation that between them both our parties have sold off all that was making an income for the gov. Royalties from mines is ludicrous when when we own the ore! Taxes from those who now own Telecom is a pittance to what it once paid , same goes with the RAIL, WATER,AIRPORTS, And our Shipping ports, Roads infrastrures etc.

Posted by: Nick Again, Maryborough

 

Friday, 11 July 2008

What Swan says is a lie. No scientist or economist knows what the effect is at the moment. What we do know is that a premature implementation will cost billions of dollars. Are we going to let this lie slide by unquestioned? Is Swan's rhetoric stepping up because he can see the policy position is bad?

Posted by: Happy Fun Ball, Carramar/Sydney

 

Friday, 11 July 2008

I really thought Labor would make a difference, they are but for all the wrong reasons. I Hate to admit it but they are an absolute shambles Mr Costello Please step up to the plate , Australia needs you

Posted by: Pete Ex labor, Sydney

 

Friday, 11 July 2008

Wayne Swan please stop making these broad politically motivated statements. Where is the economic modeling that shows the effects of not acting, acting in 2010 or 2012? Where is the Scientific reports showing the percentage of Australias direct contribution to the man made causes of global warming?. Where is the report showing what would be the effect of Australias sacrifices if the major polluters fail to act or delay their actions? And your analogy of ETS and Superannuation is invalid-apples and pears

Posted by: Desmond Harris, Beacon Hill

 
 

YOUR SAY




 


 

500 characters maximum. 500 characters left.


 

* Required field

 
Register to receive daily news and sports details

YOUR SAY

Well done again Tim. Another good look at this crap about Mums as if they are special. If MUMS don't want to be singled out... Graeme Henderson, Darling Downs on Kerry Armstrong's Coke campaign weirder than it seems

This is "popularist" politics from Rudd the king of "popularist" politics - something that Rudd accuses the opposition of doingd all the time. Rudd =... Geoff Bolton, Lane Cove on Coalition rejects cap on executive salaries

How convoluted Henderson! If all the privately insured people leave private health then the public system fails almost immediately. To meet the increased need YOU... Geoff Bolton, Lane Cove on Medicare bill set to pass parliament

An Emirates plane made an emergency landing at Perth airport today. It probably won't make the news...WHY? Because it wasn't Qantas. Sad.... Gareth Benson, Blacktown on Govt to watch Qantas inquiry closely

Dudd Dudd Dudd - he must then start with his wife - is he saying that she is a fat cat and making too much... Tony M, Bangor on Rudd to take swipe at fat cat salaries