Macquarie Network ::: 2GB | 2CH | LIVENEWS | RUGBYLEAGUELIVE | WHAT CAREER | AMAZING AUSTRALIANS :::
Friday, 29 August 2008

Emissions trading scheme costs 'exaggerated': Garnaut

11/07/2008 12:02:00 PM.  | 
The costs of an emissions trading scheme on Australian households are exaggerated, the federal government's chief climate change adviser says.

Professor Ross Garnaut addressed a public forum in Brisbane today on a national tour to discuss his draft climate change report, which recommends an emissions trading scheme be phased in by 2010.

He rejected claims the transport industry would be forced to pass on the increased costs of an emission trading scheme.

"There will be some increases in prices, they will be modest in dimension compared with a lot of the changes that have been happening as a result, for example, of the increase in oil prices," he told reporters.

"I think there's a lot of exaggeration going on and the important thing is (that) if and when the prices of some goods and services rise there's adequate compensation ... for low income Australian households (from governments)."

Prof Garnaut said Queensland would be a big loser if no action was taken.

"There are serious risks to the Great Barrier Reef, the drying and warming of southern Australia will have its effects through the Darling Downs and the rest of the Queensland end of the Murray-Darling system," he said.

"The warming of a state that's already a warm state is going to have significant health impacts."

The government will release its response to professor Garnaut's climate change report next Wednesday, which could include a proposed emissions trading scheme model.

COMMENTS

Friday, 11 July 2008

Well Ross Garnaut you are the ‘expert’, the economist- where are your figures? You should be able to tell us the consequences for the economy in terms of prices and inflation, interest rates, jobs and economic growth. It would be most irresponsible to suggest a course of action without making a sensible assessment of the consequences of that action. Fear mongering about the consequences of not acting should not be the only response in explaining results.

Posted by: Desmond Harris, Beacon Hill

 

Friday, 11 July 2008

Garnaut does not know what the costs will be, in scientific terms, because scientists don't know either. Some are saying there will be no costs if we defer indefinitely. Garnaut does not know, and is lying if he claims to. His more moderate statement is, then, a more moderate lie.

Posted by: Happy Fun Ball, Carramar/Sydney

 

Sunday, 13 July 2008

The biggest emissions come from the mining and energy sector. No way will we be compensated enough to cover the cost of any new tax.This just doesnt happen!These giants have protection from environment laws put in place by both atate and Fed. Govs. So how do we expect a fair deal? The big minning giants wont be subject to JACK! The labor unions will see to it and the we the public will pick up the slack as usual. What is moderate? You want a small home or moderate home? Moderate indeed!

Posted by: Nick Again, Maryborough

 
 

YOUR SAY




 


 

500 characters maximum. 500 characters left.


 

* Required field

 

YOUR SAY

Interesting decision but the fact that she was right on the limit is relevant. One must allow a certain margin of error. However, I believe... Graeme Henderson, Darling Downs on Pat O'Shane escapes drink driving conviction

The Business lobby is a totally disinterested party , not just looking to cream the profits and fees from such a sale right? NO WAY, NO... Carlos Medina, Parramatta on Business groups back Iemma's new electricity plan

Sales - what value is there in silencing all the people that disagree with your warped view of life? I believe you've named the only... Geoff Bolton, Lane Cove on Mike Carlton sacked by the Sydney Morning Herald

AND add yourself, Mark Sales, to the far left jerk narrow mind list - and that would make the rest of us conservatives happy!... Terri McGraw, Lane Cove on Mike Carlton sacked by the Sydney Morning Herald

Greg Born, Mackay. Well, relevant laws would be a good start. The units of measurement would be handy. Road rules could be useful. Very basic... Graeme Henderson, Darling Downs on Australian citizenship test to be radically overhauled