Macquarie Network ::: 2GB | 2CH | LIVENEWS | STREET CORNER | RUGBYLEAGUELIVE | WHAT CAREER | AMAZING AUSTRALIANS :::
Tuesday, 02 December 2008

Movie company deems actor as 'ugly, black and unbankable'

27/09/2008 5:09:00 PM.  | AAP
Acclaimed Australian director Rowan Woods had to fight to keep Oscar winner Forest Whitaker in his new film Winged Creatures after a film company executive dismissed the actor as "ugly, black and unbankable."

Despite having "the hottest ensemble cast in town", including Guy Pearce, Kate Beckinsale, Dakota Fanning, Jeanne Tripplehorn and Jennifer Hudson, Woods said the company who owned the script wouldn't accept Whitaker as a leading man.

"The initial finance fell through when I stuck with Forest Whitaker for the role of Charlie," Woods said.

"An executive told me straight: `Even if he wins the Oscar he's ugly, he's black and he's unbankable.'"

Speaking at the Australian Directors Guild conference in Sydney this weekend, Woods said the company, which he wouldn't name for legal reasons, eventually let go of the script because of their disagreement over Whitaker.

The budget on Winged Creatures dropped from $US11 million to $US4.5 million because Woods wouldn't consider a Michael Douglas or an Al Pacino for Whitaker's role.

"The unbankable part of it was nearly right," he said.

"They wanted everyone but Forest Whitaker ... and this is one of the best actors on the planet.

"By the time we had stacked the cast around Forest the asking price for the movie had more than halved from its initial level."

Winged Creatures centres around a random shooting in a Los Angeles diner, and how it affects the lives of those who witness it.

It is Woods' third feature film after local productions Little Fish and The Boys.

He said he was instantly drawn to the multi-storyline drama by Roy Freirich.

"This wasn't the happy anecdote to my previous movies but it was too tempting," he said.

"There was a quiet ferocity to the screen play that confronted the hypocrisy of the US gun lobby without being overtly political."

Woods said his high profile cast was a pleasure to work with except for teenage starlet Dakota Fanning, who could be a diva on the set.

She initially refused to come out of her trailer on day one of shooting because her scene wasn't filmed first, and was "intensely jealous" of her young co-star Josh Hutcherson.

"Everyone was on their best behaviour on this film because they have got a `really serious Australian director who is known for his ensemble work'," Woods laughed.

"(Fanning) was the only one who was naughty."

Woods said while he thinks Fanning is a fine actor, on this film she didn't hit the mark.

"She is a gorgeous girl ... but she was the disaster," he said.

"There was something about her presence that wasn't ringing true.

"Most of our work was cutting her scenes and a lot of her scenes were cut."

Winged Creatures is due for a March 2009 release in the US with Australia to follow shortly after.

COMMENTS

Saturday, 27 September 2008

I guess racism is alive and well in all corners of the world. For shame, Australia I thought better than you!

Posted by: Liam Ford, Lugano

Sunday, 28 September 2008

Liam, this is an AMERICAN film company and executives the article is talking about. The only Australian ingredient is the director, who was the one sticking up for Whitaker. Why don't you try reading articles before you comment on them. sheesh.

Posted by: George S, Bondi

Friday, 17 October 2008

perhaps you can try RE READING the article, no where does it say any austrailian person or company was racist. it was a us finance company. and obviously they are just down right moronic. its says alot for Rowan Woods that he stood by the most talented and right person for the role.

Posted by: LEA D, Hollywood

 

Saturday, 27 September 2008

lets singalong..."its a *(white) mans world"

Posted by: sally ryan, west hoxton

Monday, 29 September 2008

look, dont get hurt and end up somewhere you dont want to. and no, i am not blk. you really dont know what is about to happen.

Posted by: cheryl cheryl, antioch

 

Saturday, 27 September 2008

Liam Ford, Lugano, check out: http://www.livenews.com.au/Articles/2008/09/27/Movie_company_deems_actor_as_ugly_black_and_unbankable#comments Racism is rife, but they are all cowards so they try to hide it.

Posted by: Graeme Henderson, Darling Downs

 

Sunday, 28 September 2008

This didn't stop Marcia Hines, Tiger Woods or Jean Marie Baptist being successful. If the bloke has what it takes; he will still make it regardless of what people think of him. If he has the talent; he will make ten fold of those who critisise him. You can't change what you are; it is what you do with what you have that counts.

Posted by: James H, United Socialist States of Australia

Saturday, 04 October 2008

What the hell is a bloke? Is that derogatory?

Posted by: mo none, la

Sunday, 19 October 2008

Bloke is just another term for guy. Nothing notty there

Posted by: that girl, kc

 

Sunday, 28 September 2008

Ugly, black, unbankable???? It must have been a white man who came up with that. Forrest just exudes all that a man is. Black skin is thick and lush, sensuous to the touch, like satin and velvet made flesh. Unbankable - you've got to be kidding.

Posted by: Joan Cashmore, Bowen

 

Tuesday, 30 September 2008

white america and white people in other countries will all ways be racial because thy live in mind sets and thru the media if white america truly wanted to show there not racial then stand up and stop watching rascist acts and say nothing about it you want more proof llok at this presidential election as stupid and eratic as palin and mccain have been if they were running against kerry,edwards the polls would show a landslide margin in the democrats favor

Posted by: ronald moe, irvington

 

Tuesday, 30 September 2008

There is no surprise here. Why would anyone think that these comments or opinions would be out of character for an Australian considering there treatment of the Aboriginal people....

Posted by: Curtis James, Hollywood

Wednesday, 01 October 2008

Curtis, it was the Poms that were ruling the country who were tough on the aborigines, the same rulers who took slaves to America. They consficated the land for the King and and called it Crown Land and then sold it to settlers. Ordinary Australian settlers lived among the aborigines.

Posted by: Rob Banks, Canberra

 

Tuesday, 30 September 2008

Show some respect to an Oscar winner, an accomplished actor, and an intelligent man. Besides, you really wouldn't have the ballz to say that to his face now would you? LOL. Ofcourse not...cowards.

Posted by: Lex Lux, Washington D.C.

 

Tuesday, 30 September 2008

People need to remember that ugly is a relative term.. and what most whites consider beautiful Blacks consider super ugly.. ex: Paris Hilton.

Posted by: Barry Larry, California

Tuesday, 30 September 2008

Barry, Lex and Curtis; you 3 load mouth septic's; it was your own film company that made the remarks; it was the Australian that stuck up for him. You are not only ignorant; you are illiterate too. Why don't you go and crawl back under your rock and wait for the next UFO to come and do more experiments on you.

Posted by: James H, United Socialist States of Australia

Tuesday, 30 September 2008

I don't think Paris Hilton is anywhere near ugly? I am Black and neither does my daughters or any female that I know. So she must be ugly to just you specifically, which is ok. But for any of you to say you speak for all people because of the similarities you share concerning levels of melanin is rediculous! Skin is an organ. It doesn't provide personality traits, just protection from the elements. It's culture that really defines us.

Posted by: shaaron evans, baltimore

 

Tuesday, 30 September 2008

Well it is an American company and racism is alive and running rampant here...but none the less kudos to the director for sticking to his guns when it came to Mr. Whitaker.he's a fine actor and that's what a good movie needs..Hollywood's stigma on beauty is the same redundant people who cant to save there lives..but because thats what sell but the movie industry has been in sort of a slump because of that way of thinking..it should matter on race creed or gender if you can act then you can act.

Posted by: I really dont give a damn Sir, jakarta

 

Tuesday, 30 September 2008

Forest Whitaker - unbankable???? He's a self-made millionaire and is extremely talented, thus the Oscar. I'm glad that the director stood up to the racists and didn't try to hide their remarks or justify their opinions. It's too bad that he couldn't release the film company's name so that others can boycott them.

Posted by: Rashana Burkestein, Ardmore

 

Tuesday, 30 September 2008

Hollywood is made up of way too many people who learned prejudice on their parents' knees. It's time someone proved them wrong but told them to go straight to Hell!!!

Posted by: Jalyn Morris, Salisbury, MD

 

Tuesday, 30 September 2008

I LOVE Forrest Whitaker! I think he is a fabulous actor and everything I have seen him in was intense and dramatic and showed his sincerity and commitment as an actor. People love to judge others and not give them a chance because of race, creed, color, religion - and in reality, they are the ones who are loosing out. I am glad that others saw the potential and artistry in this man and carried on with the project. At least he is professional and didn't cost the studio extra like Fanning.

Posted by: Paula Ward, Antioch

 

Tuesday, 30 September 2008

ooo Wow Forrest Whitaker played good in Jason's Lyric in "94" his still good though I dont think that I thought only AmeriKKKa was only racist wow I really just about seen it all. =|

Posted by: Kim Lashea, Houston / Katy

 

Tuesday, 30 September 2008

I'm black and he's not a favorite for me to see on the big screen. Give me Tamiak, Brian White, or Blair Underwood.

Posted by: Marie Smith, somewhere

 

Tuesday, 30 September 2008

I am a very proud African American such as brothra Forrest Whitaker, I find white racism in the world in 2008 still very prevalent and a real ugly factor. Mr.Whitaker is a very fine actor from California such as myself, he deserves just as much or more adulates as most or more than some of Hollywood's so-called fine actors to date. It is a God-awful shame that a black man or person still has to play the SERVANT character amongst white folk, just to be respected. WE WILL NEVER BOW DOWN AGAIN!.

Posted by: ellamel emel, woodland hills

 

Wednesday, 01 October 2008

Much love to the "Australian" director Rowan Woods for exposing racism no matter what part of the world it's in. Neighbors of the world, wake-up. This sickness is a taught and passed down from one generation to the next, like a family heirloom that needs to be broken.

Posted by: Christine Hicks, Southfield

 

Wednesday, 01 October 2008

My favorite part has to be: "The budget on Winged Creatures dropped from $US11 million to $US4.5 million because Woods wouldn't consider a Michael Douglas or an Al Pacino for Whitaker's role." When was the last time Michael Douglas or Al Pacino had a hit anywhere around the globe to still be considered bankable. I was recently trying to get funding for an Al Pacino film and got laughed out of the room because of his asking price.

Posted by: Steevie Wuunda, New York

 

Wednesday, 01 October 2008

I think it is so sad, but not at all surprising that the color of this man's skin would even be an issue. I mean with all of the flops coming out lately, be thankful that there is still some talent in Hollywood. And yes, Forest Whitaker may be ugly, but so are Michael Douglas, Al Pacino, Robert DeNiro, Jim Carrey and Robin Williams. That hasn't stopped them from having great careers.

Posted by: Jolie Garwood, Houston

 

Wednesday, 01 October 2008

You only have to look at what is happening in Africa to see who the real racists are. don't youi? Blacks in America make me laugh when they start calling the kettle black. Whoever puts up the money gets to say who is in the movie and who is not. You want to make a movie with Whitaker, then come up with the money and make it. Just because one guy purports to say Whitaker is "ugly, black and unbankable," doesn't warrant all this discourse. Did you hear the man say it??

Posted by: Pithy Opiner, Stockton, California

Wednesday, 01 October 2008

That comment made absolutely no sense at all. The money has been put up, Forrest Whitaker is starring in the movie and the movie is completed.

Posted by: Victor Moore, Norfolk

 

Wednesday, 01 October 2008

Forest W. is one of the greatest actors in the world. This man can play "any" role. Forest W. has been around for a long time and has proven himself time and time again with not only being versatile but evolving with the times as well. He went from movies like "The Crying Game" to "Jason's Lyric" to you name it and still can do any type of film, any cultured script. Get with the program! Al P. is good but mostly known for mob or theft movies. Forest W. is well rounded with all.

Posted by: Kaiya Bullseye, chicago

 

Saturday, 04 October 2008

Forest W. is a awesome actor. That fact that he was discriminated against is no suprise. Every single race on this earth have always hated black people and always will. Forest W. should have told them to kiss natural black a$%!!! Hollywood and White AmeriKKKa has always cast my people in stereotypical roles(maids, gangstas, idiots,etc...) That's just the nature of the WHITE BEAST.

Posted by: Jenel WooWoo, Tampa, FL

Saturday, 04 October 2008

I'm an actress, and I a black and I will NEVER play any stereotypical roles..NEVER! I would rather work less, and play juicy, powerful, meaningful roles, that work to work all the time, and play "shaniqua" , hood rat type roles! Go Forest! Does anyone know who the company was that made the racist comment? I hope it gets leaked.

Posted by: mo none, LA

 

Saturday, 04 October 2008

gee, funny that, susan lawe hasnt espoused an opinion on this article. could someone please tell her that her sarah palin doll has arrived, please pick it up!

Posted by: dead zemanak, redfern

 

Saturday, 04 October 2008

I noticed that owner of this movie company is so cowardly that he prohibits Woods (or anyone else) from mentioning the name of the company with regard to this film. First of all, congratulations to Woods for standing up to the bigot, who just happened to lucky to get Forest Whittaker in the first place since no prominent white actor would take the role. If someone could find out the name of this racist and spread the word he could only present his films to a limited audience like the KKK.

Posted by: Herbert Chaney, New Brunswick, NJ

 

Saturday, 04 October 2008

He was EXCELLENT in the Crying Game and since that movie I've often wondered why don't we see him more as the leading man.

Posted by: tara land, fayetteville

 

Sunday, 05 October 2008

I am so sick of this Black crap I could die I am white, Indian, Greek and Irish, Black Irish.When are people going to get over this racism stuff. There are alot of ugly white actors, Forest is a good actor. You ALL need to grow the hell up. We are ALL people our insides are put together the same. We are made in God's image. Who cares what color; color will Not matter when the End is here.

Posted by: Teresa Hinds, Tucson

 

Sunday, 05 October 2008

SHAME ON YOU HOLLYWOOD!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!! tHERE have been so many broken barriers in Tinsletown. Just goes to show you how Fake it really is there.

Posted by: Teresa Hinds, Tucson

 

Friday, 17 October 2008

Why would they use that ugly black guy.. when they could have OJ.. for chump change ??? Run Forest RUN... Dakota is starting to look a little like Lindsay Lowhan..she's on her way ..a good little lesbian.. I mean thesbian..

Posted by: John Fean, Beantown/Ma

 

Saturday, 18 October 2008

Would someone please explain to me why an ugly actor like Forrest Whitaker is unbankable, while an ugly actor like Jack Nicholson or Nick Nolte (shudder) is a bonafide movie star, no questions asked?

Posted by: Patty Cake, Los Angeles

 

Saturday, 18 October 2008

actors's performances are the director's responsibility -- especially 13 year old girls' -- and then to trash her in public for his own failure? Unbelievable. Not a great way to get her on talk shows about his own movie. And to play the hero for "fighting for Forest," that's not his limelight to grab, it's stealing a victim's story for your own aggrandizement -- it's not this blowhard's right to announce it in public with himself as her