Macquarie Network ::: 2GB | 2CH | LIVENEWS | STREET CORNER | RUGBYLEAGUELIVE | WHAT CAREER | AMAZING AUSTRALIANS :::
Tuesday, 02 December 2008

We're being bullied into a cashless Harbour Bridge

16/10/2008 1:22:00 PM.  | Alan Jones

RELATED ARTICLES

LATEST FEATURES

I've received a stack of correspondence in relation to the Harbour Bridge becoming cashless. And perhaps to some this is no big issue.

But to a minority, and they are entitled to a viewpoint and they're entitled not to be marginalised, becoming cashless is a big issue.

Well, Brian wrote to me and summed up many of the views that have been expressed.

Amongst other things he said, "Looking at the number of vehicles which use the Bridge and motorways with tags, I cannot comprehend how so many people give large organisations access to their accounts to withdraw any amount of money from them as they see fit.

"Do they go along like sheep, thinking 'If I don't accept the conditions I don't get a tag'?

"Well," Brian says, "I won't accept the conditions and therefore won't get a tag.

"What," he asks, "are the alternatives?

"Use the Gladesville Bridge."

He says, "I don't have a computer so I can't e-mail.  I don't SMS.  I don't use ATMs.  I don't Netbank.

"But I'm getting dragged, screaming, into the technology era.

"I'm sure I'm not the only one.

"Just let me pay each time I go over the Bridge."

Brian writes, "I base my objections on the following:

"The Bradfield Highway, the Harbour Bridge is a public road and should be accessible to all the public, not just the ones who have tags.

"When the Harbour tunnel became cashless there was the alternative of the Harbour Bridge.  But if the Bridge became cashless there's no alternative other than to travel extra kilometres, with the way petrol prices are today, over the Gladesville Bridge."

He writes, "I'm led to believe all the other toll roads are privately owned.  So if they, too, become cashless, which is the inference I get from the new Premier's statement, then alternative roads should run parallel to these toll roads, and they shouldn't involve any extra mileage for the motorist".

Brian makes the point that when he travelled without a tag, he was nabbed by the RTA, wrote a cheque but the RTA "lost the cheque".

He says "As an organisation who could not even secure an cheque, how could I in all honesty give them access to my accounts?

He says "My conversations with the toll collectors have given me the impression that they're not happy with the situation.  They know they'll be out of a job".

But finally, he says, "It's said that making it cashless will speed up the flow.

"How can this happen," he says, "when you have a maximum of five lanes heading south, yet there are only three lanes to the Western Distributor and one lane, not counting the bus lane, going to York Street.

"My mathematics seem to establish that one lane can still have a cash booth without hindering traffic.

"Leave one booth," he pleads, "on the Bridge for PAYG, pay as you go drivers".

Well I happen to believe that Brian has a more than valid point.

COMMENTS

Thursday, 16 October 2008

Another alternative is to simply fine any driver who uses the bridge and doesn't have a tag. That is how the Nazis would do it .. but hey, isn't that what is suggested for now?

Posted by: Happy Fun Ball, Carramar/Sydney

 

Thursday, 16 October 2008

Alan, me and the missus have stopped going to Sydney because the cashless-but-not-free tollways have spooked us. One wonders how many other out-of-towners are in the same boat? And its the NSW economy that suffers!

Posted by: Paul Neri, Canberra

 

Thursday, 16 October 2008

Poor deluded Brian. None of Sydney's roads belong to the public anymore. They are the fiefdom of the RTA who randomly close off whole corridors for special interest groups like buses and taxis! Get a tag and get a life.

Posted by: Happy Little Gumnut, Sydney

 

Thursday, 16 October 2008

I'm amazed Brian wasnt Blazed by the "friedman theory" Hugging Jones. Afterall, By going against "cashless",Would mean he suddnely goes against the Bankers way of ideology. cashless means More profit for the Toll company, the banks playing wioth your accounts also hit pay dirt with fees added. Perhaps, if the Governments were to look about themselves, they'd realise all the missed oportunity of Income, having given up anything that makes a $. being a "free" country, people should have the choice

Posted by: Nick Again, maryborough

 

Thursday, 16 October 2008

The Scottish Government abolished the tolls on our bridges here. It would be good if yours could do the same !

Posted by: Jock McTaggart, Golasgow

Friday, 17 October 2008

Funny how Jock McTaggart can't even spell the name of the city he is supposedly from. We Aussies know that the Scots are supposed to be tight when it comes to paying, so I guess it's no wonder that some tolls in GLASGOW have been removed. Then again, you probably don't have a bunch of oxygen thieves who pose as a state government, when they are more like the Sheriff of Notingham, representing a sham and taxing us out of everything we own.

Posted by: Paul H, Penrith

 

Friday, 17 October 2008

So glad I don't live in Australia. Brian is right on the money. This cashless, give-the-government-and-the-corporations-immediate-access-to-all-your-money mentality has got to stop. And the only way for it to stop is for people to refuse to go along with it. Martin Luther King, Jr. organized a bus boycott, and brought a city to its knees. How about a good old-fashioned bridge boycott.

Posted by: Bob Bobbob, MY CITY

Monday, 17 November 2008

How about a blockade of the bridge, demanding that it be free to cross or reduce the toll to only cover the cost of maintenance. Not for profit, as the public have paid for the bridge long ago. I am glad you are standing up for the public as the PUBLIC SERVANTS seem to have forgotten who they work for..."ANIMAL FARM" & "1984"

Posted by: Kay de Bry, Coogee

 

Monday, 17 November 2008

ETAG CONSPIRACY BY HIGHWAY ROBBERS The NSW Government has a hidden agenda with the ETag. Once they have forced everyone to have an ETag, They will then install direct debits on speed cameras, parking meters etc. What would stop them from then installing tolls anywhere they want ie: the city. The sky is the limit for this money grabbing government. The motorists are just lambs to the slaughter.

Posted by: Kay de Bry, Coogee

 

Monday, 17 November 2008

People who have chosen not to have an ETag, people who live outside the city and tourists are in essence being banned from using motorways. It is ridiculous to force people to have an ETag if they do not need or want one. If you rarely use the bridge then the $80 + is just sitting for years in whose bank account?

Posted by: Katherone de Bry, Coogee

 
 

YOUR SAY




 


 

500 characters maximum. 500 characters left.


 

* Required field

 
Register to receive daily news and sports details

YOUR SAY

he has a real job max what to you is a real job isnt a Chief Executive Officer of the Aboriginal Legal Service in WA,a... Belinda Hummie, New lambton on Rolf Harris offends Aboriginal community with risque comments

I really respect Bush, and if the Dalai respected those whom he loved he would too. The truth is Bush policies have been for the... Happy Fun Ball, Carramar/Sydney on The Dalai Lama 'loves' Bush, unsupportive of policies

What planet are you from??????... The Equalizer, Gold Coast on The Dalai Lama 'loves' Bush, unsupportive of policies

I think that this is just a government beat up so that they can justify unlocking more funds to pork barrel for their mates. I... Happy Fun Ball, Carramar/Sydney on Today's monster rate cut just the beginning

"I wish the intelligence had been different". Bulls..t you created your own internal committee to vet and distort what the CIA/NSC/FBI provided in regards to... The Equalizer, Gold Coast on Bush's 'biggest regret' on Iraq, Saddam