Macquarie Network ::: 2GB | 2CH | LIVENEWS | STREET CORNER | RUGBYLEAGUELIVE | WHAT CAREER | AMAZING AUSTRALIANS :::
Thursday, 08 January 2009

Liberal MP defies Turnbull on IR bill

1/12/2008 9:55:00 PM.  | AAP
A NSW Liberal MP will defy his leader's direction not to stand in the way of Labor's bill to kill Work Choices.

Federal Opposition Leader Malcolm Turnbull has said Work Choices is dead and that the coalition accepts Labor's mandate to abolish the Howard government's industrial relations regime.

He has said the coalition won't oppose the legislation but reserves its right to move amendments in the upper house following a Senate inquiry.

But Liberal backbencher Alby Schultz says he will vote against the bill in its initial form, and will not support the bill when it returns from the Senate unless it addresses his concerns.

"Whilst the Australian people may have given the Rudd government a mandate for further workplace relations changes, I don't believe for one minute that the Australian people have given the government or the unions the right to return our workplaces to the bad old days of union domination," he told parliament on Monday.

Mr Schultz said his main concern about the bill was its green light for unions to enter workplaces and inspect non-union employees' wage records.

"I find it totally reprehensible that, after the introduction of this bill, a union will have the right to enter a workplace and demand, among other things, the production of records pertaining to the wages of non-union members, even in workplaces where the employer and employees have previously agreed that they don't want unions," he said.

Mr Schultz said he was concerned exemptions from unfair dismissal laws for small business would be removed under Labor's bill.

He said compulsory bargaining and arbitration for low-paid workers could turn into industry-based bargaining and arbitration.

"I can only deduce that the introduction of this bill is a way to insert union-dominated dogma into all businesses and return compulsory union membership," he said.

COMMENTS

Monday, 01 December 2008

Sargent Schultz is obviously making a play for the Leadership here.

Posted by: Graeme Henderson, Darling Downs

 

Tuesday, 02 December 2008

''the bad old days'' depends how far you want to go back. if you go back far enough, times were infinitely superior to what they are now. full employment, affordable housing, little household debt, job security and much better public services. in fact these years were 'the good old days '

Posted by: david green, wiley pk

Tuesday, 02 December 2008

I agree with him, why should the Union have the right to enter a non Union workplace and have access to non Union workers personal information. Why should they have access to anyone's personal information who is not a Union member. The bill does need some amending . No one should have access to anyone's personal information without their permission, we have privacy laws , why should the Union be above them.

Posted by: susan lawe, wherever

Tuesday, 02 December 2008

david green,-Surely you are not talking about the Whitlam and Hawke/Keating years?

Posted by: Desmond Harris, Beacon Hill

Tuesday, 02 December 2008

union got my info only a few yrs ago. they got a full list of every worker at the company plus our phone numbers and addresses. who was a union member and who wasnt. problem was i was a union member. but whoever gave the info didnt know that. i paid my fees seperately.

Posted by: Belinda Hummie, New lambton

 

Tuesday, 02 December 2008

Good to see somebody with the courage to stand up and say Workchoices was RIGHT. All the bludgers like henderson will whine and bitch but workchoices was legislation for opportunity and gave individuals the chance to imporve themselves. Labor is good for slack workers who dont want to do a fair days work but by god they want a fair days pay.

Posted by: Pete 2, North Sydney

 

Tuesday, 02 December 2008

des, going back further, to menzies. .you probably think it old fashioned but it was a superior way of life to what we have now.your ideas are even more old fashioned, no unions etc ''giving workers a chance to improve themselves' what a lovely altruistic piece of legislation. wc was how do you improve yourself with longer hours and less pay? apparently its fair that corporations make billions but not fair if a worker wants a ten dollar a week pay rise? i know who the bludgers are?

Posted by: trevor crook, wiley pk

 

Tuesday, 02 December 2008

des, going back further, to menzies. .you probably think it old fashioned but it was a superior way of life to what we have now.your ideas are even more old fashioned, no unions etc ''giving workers a chance to improve themselves' what a lovely altruistic piece of legislation. wc was how do you improve yourself with longer hours and less pay? apparently its fair that corporations make billions but not fair if a worker wants a ten dollar a week pay rise? i know who the bludgers are?

Posted by: trevor crook, wiley pk

 
 

YOUR SAY




 


 

500 characters maximum. 500 characters left.


 

* Required field

 
LiveNews now available on mobile devices

YOUR SAY

We will give you water then kill you again. kala lango... Mandingo @, deep south on Israel to halt bombing 'for three hours'

SCUMBAGS Howard and Bush these two will be remembered as just that, don't forget the lies these men told; send them both to jail including... g maybury, sydney on Howard beats Obama to sleepover at Blair House

Israel, bad to kill children. If you do not see this you are blind. Many people now starting to see this. Kala lango... Mandingo @, deep south on Children make up third of Gaza dead: medics

Greg Smith (NSW State Lib) should move to the Greens!... Geoff Bolton, Lane Cove on Liberals abandon 'tough on crime' stance

It is only 700 hundred so far. Almost 2000 dead from cholera in Zimbabve. Milion in Somalia .Yet we do nothing. What is the difference?... Poison Pen, Sydney on Vatican compares Gaza to 'concentration camp'