Macquarie Network ::: 2GB | 2CH | LIVENEWS | STREET CORNER | RUGBYLEAGUELIVE | WHAT CAREER | AMAZING AUSTRALIANS :::
Tuesday, 02 December 2008

Four wheels good, two wheels bad

10/01/2008 11:30:00 AM.  | Tim Brunero
Is anyone surprised the President of the NRMA Alan Evans reckons cycle lanes on our major motorways are a waste of money? Duh… this guy runs an organisation that represents car owners. What else would you expect him to say? Our roads should be replaced with lush fields of possies and daffodils?

But just because it’s predictable, doesn’t mean it’s not stupid.

In a submission to the RTA, Evans accuses the body of wasting millions on cyclists at the expense of motorists.

Zeroing in on the Lane Cove Tunnel debacle he whines: "Cyclists appear to be the only winners on Epping Road, at the expense of thousands of motorists." Actually, Alan, the other winners appear to be the Lane Cove Tunnel’s owner Connector Motorways which is being paid $25 million by Morris Iemma for simply delaying their contractual right to reduce Epping Road from three lanes to one. The space left on the road will be dedicated to a bus lane and a cycle lane.

Why isn’t Evans annoyed at that? $25 million for delaying the outrageous. Is it because cyclists are a softer target than the Labor government?

Surely Alan understands this – unless his spin doctors are still on holidays and there’s no-one at NRMA HQ to explain it to him.

Not that I’m a cheerleader for the grim contract negotiated by the Lane Cove Tunnel operators which allows them to effectively take lanes off Epping Road to force people into their tunnel. The whole thing smacks of a bad comedy – build a second road to ease traffic congestion and then close the first one so it’s just as bad. It should serve as a reminder that when governments get private enterprise to build public infrastructure instead of borrowing the money and building it themselves it’s us that end up paying with these ridiculous road closures. If only the Liberals offered another way – but they’re keener on private enterprise than Labor.

But, Alan, why take on the poor old cyclists? We should be encouraging them - not punishing them. Cyclists deserve a dedicated lane. I wonder if you’ve ever actually ridden down a motorway with semi trailers doing 100 kph hurtling past 30 centimetres from your ear?

And I say all this as a cyclist, car owner and member of the NRMA. I say it as someone who rides to work every day and knows from experience it’s faster, cheaper and more pleasant than driving.

Admittedly I live in Darlington, a micro-suburb wedged between Chippendale and Redfern. And work in Pyrmont.

But even in my leisure time I find I often have multiple options when travelling in the city – bus, train and car. More often than not I choose my bike because it’s quick and I know I won’t have to find a park.

The point is we need to build proper infrastructure so cyclists can ride to work. And it’s more than just cycleways. We need a more holistic approach. To have places where city workers can store bikes and get showered and changed for example. Maybe a pilot scheme could be run by the City Council? We could force new city office buildings to integrate such facilities before being approved. Or we could choose not to charge cyclists a double fare when they take their bikes on the train in peak hour.

But what we shouldn’t do is listen to future-eaters like Alan Evans who doesn’t even seem able to understand the basics. His enemy isn’t cyclists - it’s stupid government policy.

COMMENTS

Thursday, 10 January 2008

Yeah got ya tim....I'm sort of bemused as to why the NRMA is letting themselves be the mouthpiece for anti-cyclist feeling. It's just crazy

Posted by: Amy Birmingham, Bowral

 

Thursday, 10 January 2008

Getting private companies to build puplic ingastructure is always more expensive than the Government doing it themselves. Private ownership of roads should be banned. Of course banning cars from cities would also help, cycling would be much more pleasant then, make car lanes the exception not the rule.

Posted by: Graeme Henderson,

 

Thursday, 10 January 2008

Sales of bicycles beat sales of cars last year – I think someone needs to tell this nrma guy that…

Posted by: IAN mcphedran, Sydney

 

Thursday, 10 January 2008

NRMA SHOULD STICK TO MOTORING – AND IT HAS NO MANDATE TO BE OUT THEIR CAMPAIGNING DOES IT REALLY – IT’S MEMBERS JUST WANT ROADSIDE ASSISTANCE – NOT A POLITICAL ACTION GROUP

Posted by: Steve Fortesque, My Business

 

Thursday, 10 January 2008

Where has the NRMA been for the last few years? All over the western world urban people are increasingly turning to cycling for transport and recreation needs and that includes Sydney. Council's own research shows that people want to take up cycling for environmental, health and economic reasons but are reluctant because of the lack of safer coherent cycling infrastructure. This is where the NRMA's rubbery financial figures fall down. The cycling infrastructure that today's governments are finally, albeit slowly, building are investments for generations to come. You can not simply apply the construction cost to current use rates in isolation. As a member of the NRMA I should also point out that in any one week I drive my car, catch public transport, walk to work and ride my bicycle. Our road infrastructure must be understood in a holistic, balanced and sustainable context if it is to serve the needs of Sydney for generations to come. Shayne Mallard Councillor City of Sydney Sydney Town

Posted by: Shayne Mallard, Sydney

 

Thursday, 10 January 2008

Tim - good on you for writing the benefit side of cycling. Shayne - wish you started the Sydney Cycling Strategy (everyone get online and support it!) 30 years ago before I rode there. Brisbane City Council & Qld Gov't are building a large bike storage / shower / repair shop in the centre of Brisbane so you don't need a pilot scheme, just do it! Poor Alan, - "It's hard for a man to understand something when his salary depends on him NOT understanding it." - Upton Sinclair.

Posted by: Iain Cummings, Southport

 

Thursday, 10 January 2008

Tim the NRMA did mention the 25million to delay the closure. I ride to work and dont use the new cycle way, I have been watching the non-existance Cyclist on the corner of Pittwater Rd and Epping RD and the offical count is 25 cyclists use the new path each day! Epping Rd is 10 lanes wide at Wicks RD and now will only be 2 through Lane Cove That is great logic, build a bike lane and funnel all the cars into 1 lane, what about all the extra pollution this will create within North Ryde.

Posted by: Joe Rosenfels, Ryde

 

Friday, 11 January 2008

I fail to see why you have an issue with the NRMA for been critical of the NSW Government for a cycle way that, according to their studies costs $300,000 for every cyclist that uses it. The NRMA is right in that the space and costs should have gone into another lane for motorists. While we should all be on our bikes more, for many who live and work in the north west, a car is the only option. In addition it was not Connector Motorways who set the terms of the contract; it was your beloved Labor!

Posted by: Michael Gray, North Sydney

Friday, 11 January 2008

And the Liberals have a different policy...get real.

Posted by: Tim Brunero, Sydney

Friday, 11 January 2008

Micheal, did you realise that general taxes and council rates actually subsidise car use? Rego and fuel excise are not enough to pay for the full cost of road construction, maintenance, police, SES, hospitalisations, disability pensions, car air pollution health effects etc etc that result from too much car use. Queensland Transport calculated commuter bikes actually save the community $0.60/km. NSW RTA calculated $0.287/bike km just in main road construction & maintenance.

Posted by: Iain Cummings, Southport

Friday, 11 January 2008

Micheal, some further points - look on the Australian Automobile Associations website at the road toll discussion. It has some intersting data on how much cars actually cost the community but of course they don't think of the bike as a solution to the problem. Can't ride from the NW? I bet some do even if it's only to the nearest station or bus stop. Maybe you could think about the choice about life style & living location Vs getting stuck in the car. I did & left Sydney pollution behind.

Posted by: Iain Cummings, Southport

 

Friday, 11 January 2008

There has been a survey done by the City of Sydney about 3 years ago, as I worked on collation of the survey results and outcome data. It investigated cycle lanes, work facilities, support etc. It is a shame it hasn't been acted upon. I now live in London and cycle regularly. The cycle lanes and use of bus lanes is great! It really makes it easy to get about. We have bike storage in the basement and showers at work to support commuting by bike. Would love to see Sydney go the same way!!!

Posted by: Natalie Brown, London

 

Friday, 11 January 2008

Based on Evans' mentality, cars are better than bikes. So it's ok for major road structuring to fall through if it's for cars, but not if it's for bikes. I'm just waiting for the statement that says pedestrians should be banned from walking.

Posted by: Amy Bradney-George, Brisbane

 

Friday, 11 January 2008

With bicycles costing under $100 most people buy a new one then repair the old one, so off course sales numebrs are up. So how many people are able to ride 500km per week to accomodate work, family and food trips? yea it is easy when your single and live next to your work.... you think people sit in traffic every day because they enjoy it. Come live in North Ryde and enjoy the traffic, courtesy of State goverment.

Posted by: Joe Rosenfels, Ryde

 

Friday, 11 January 2008

Is Evan's concerned with economic issues - I think the balance of payments came out yesterday we are importing $2.5 billion more than we export - now how much of that would be imported oversized four wheel drives and the imported petrol to drive these monsters around our suburban streets. If he had any more lead in his pencil he then could work out what the additional strain and cost to infrastucture is. What is the NRMA policy on that one - restrict use of them? Get your self on a bike Evans

Posted by: JOHN O'Neill, Paddington

 

Sunday, 13 January 2008

Even in places like Newcastle, where there are plenty of cycleways, other issues prevent cyclists from riding to work. You can't always stay on a cycleway but even when you do drivers in trucks and cars treat cyclists with dangerous disregard. There aren't enough laws. I could ride to work on the cycleway. It would be half an hour of hard riding each way and so great for my health if I'm not killed by traffic. However the one shower at work is used for an extra storeroom by executive decree.

Posted by: Helene See, Newcastle

 
 

YOUR SAY




 


 

500 characters maximum. 500 characters left.


 

* Required field

 
Register to receive daily news and sports details

YOUR SAY

keep ure thoughts "personal'... ura dik, sydney on Rolf Harris offends Aboriginal community with risque comments

I really thought the D.L. was a better judge of character. Very disappointing.... The Equalizer, Gold Coast on The Dalai Lama 'loves' Bush, unsupportive of policies

Richard Gere will be jealous.... Observer JWH Party, Australia on The Dalai Lama 'loves' Bush, unsupportive of policies

If the ciggies don't kill you the treatment will.... The Equalizer, Gold Coast on Popular anti-smoking pill could be causing "suicidal thoughts": TGA

I personally think we should give them a good portion of their land back to live on. Strip them of their clothing, their TV's,... Aurora Australis, Melbourne, http://aurora-australis.proboards.com on Rolf Harris offends Aboriginal community with risque comments