Macquarie Network ::: 2GB | 2CH | LIVENEWS | RUGBYLEAGUELIVE | WHAT CAREER | AMAZING AUSTRALIANS :::
Monday, 08 September 2008

Emissions plan set to hit Senate snag

17/07/2008 7:49:00 PM.  | 
The federal government's plan for emissions trading could hit a brick wall in the Senate, as opposition politicians attack the scheme from all sides.
   
Climate Change Minister Penny Wong is caught in a tug-of-war between the coalition - which thinks the scheme is too tough - and the Australian Greens, who think it is too soft.
   
Any legislation will need the support of the opposition or, failing that, the combined backing of five Greens senators, Family First's Steve Fielding and independent Nick Xenophon.
   
Senator Wong today scotched talk that a climate impasse could trigger a double dissolution of parliament.
   
"It's certainly jumping the gun, but can I say we will put forward what we believe is a responsible scheme that's in the national interest," she told reporters in Canberra.
   
Prime Minister Kevin Rudd acknowledged it would not be easy.
   
"Well, we will be attacked from both the left and the right," he told Sky News.
   
The government is seeking to put pressure on the opposition to support the emissions trading scheme - due to begin in 2010 - and to capitalise on the coalition's mixed messages on climate change.
   
Opposition Leader Brendan Nelson has criticised the scheme, warning it would unfairly target middle-income earners and push up petrol prices.
   
But opposition climate change spokesman Greg Hunt said the government had copied the Liberals' model.
   
"Basically, what they've done is they've dusted off the document that we had, adhered to what we said on a short-term approach to petrol, but they've sold out on the long term," Mr Hunt told Fairfax Radio Network.
   
Nick Minchin, leader of the opposition in the Senate, said the coalition would consider the emissions laws in detail and send them to a Senate committee for examination.
   
"We're not going to be bullied or rushed," he told ABC Radio.
   
The Greens are more willing to deal with the government - despite their concerns the scheme is too kind to coal.
   
"We will negotiate in good faith on the measures necessary to avoid dangerous climate change," Greens spokeswoman Christine Milne told AAP.
   
"I have every hope that the government will also negotiate in good faith."
   
Senator Fielding said he had doubts about emissions trading, warning families could bear the brunt, interest rates could rise and the scheme could lead to an "emissions trade recession".
   
Meanwhile, Mr Rudd has hinted the government's controversial move to means-test a rebate for household solar panels will be reviewed.
   
Earlier this year, the $8,000 rebate was restricted to households earning less than $100,000, angering environmentalists and the opposition.
   
Mr Rudd said the government would roll out energy efficiency measures for homes as part of emissions trading.
   
"On the solar panels point ... all these renewable energy arrangements, particularly those affecting households, are very much in the mix as we now approach the assistance that will help households," he told Fairfax Radio.
   
Federal Treasurer Wayne Swan said the inflationary impact of emissions trading was unlikely to force the Reserve Bank of Australia (RBA) to lift interest rates. The cost of living is tipped to rise by 0.9 per cent in the scheme's first year.
   
"(Reserve Bank) Governor (Glenn) Stevens has made some commentary in public on this issue and he's made the very simple point that the one-off impact of a carbon pollution reduction scheme would be 'looked through' by the reserve bank," Mr Swan told ABC Radio.
    
Senator Wong said emissions trading would not add to the cost of liquefied petroleum gas for motorists. Diesel will also not rise in price.

COMMENTS

Thursday, 17 July 2008

The clumsy final solution that I seek for future instructions is - What is best for the environment to burn or to bury?

Posted by: Rob Banks, Canberra

Friday, 18 July 2008

Why should we be helping "developing" countries. China has US$1.4Trillion in reserves and growing. They are going Nuclear as is the UK, whose paying for this, Australia?. China, India, Russian, USA, do not give a hoot what Wong and Rudd think or say. They want to destroy the Australian economy and give hand out to people. How dehuminising is that. NZ already owes developing countries $1B.

Posted by: Andy Mac, HK

 

Friday, 18 July 2008

Go Labor you SAD thing! Compensation for MULTI-BILLION $ industries owned overseas!? Why the Tax On LNG? In case you Missed it KRUDDY boy, LNG burns 4- 5 times cleaner than coal! Why resource 500 mill for clean burning coal when we can drop it altogether? Swap the caol fro boiling the water to gas, simple! No, labor has tax us to make any cash? Why no treas. modelling untill after close of comment time? More rorting the public. Didnt see anything about Mandatory shift from coal fired power?

Posted by: Nick Again, Maryborough

 

Friday, 18 July 2008

China will do what china will do. India is only worried about india and the USA will protect USA interests. China is building a city the size of Melbourne every week, a coal fired power station every 10 days. they have 12 lane freeways choked with cars. Australia's carbon trading system is like two fleas on a dogs back arguing which way the dog will go. total and utter futility. computer modled madness.

Posted by: Steve A, Camden

 

Friday, 18 July 2008

Even if Australia's entire population sat in their lounge rooms with the lights off. Ate Gyprock and held our breath till we died, we would have absolutely no effect on the weather. Go on KRUDD shut Australia down see what happens, the world will get colder like it has for the last ten years, or it will get warmer, because that is what climate does IT CHANGES EVERY DAY. What if chicken little was wrong?? ?? ?

Posted by: Steve A, Camden

 

Friday, 18 July 2008

SPIN SPIN SPIN, From Wong on her CRAPCRAP CRAP. If we take Rudds $500 per family extra costs per yr. How much will Labor have to compensate the community in rebates for this absurd new policy of economic folly to the Australian economy for families on the poverty line of joint income of $53,000 per year. Public servants with huge increases. No one has mentioned the real numbers. Lets say 10% of 22 Million people will cost the Labor Govt AUD$1,100,000,000.00 per annum in rebates to them?

Posted by: Andy Mac, HK

 

Friday, 18 July 2008

The amount of Wheat Straw burnt off yearly in the USA is Enormous. The Fact it's polluting not factoring, think on this. In one year what they Burn could build 2,000,000 2000 sq.Ft Homes! Not only would help the enviromnment, but house many of the homless in places like mexico, africa, sth America etc. Rice stem is also usable. Too bad Steel companies dont want to know about. forsetry Industries fear it. Govt. wont make it so? Tax us for Carbon Instead.? Lead us by the NOSE!!

Posted by: Nick Again, Maryborough

 

Friday, 18 July 2008

Penny Wong, with the Amount of LNg/LPG we have in this country, it's nothing short of a slap in the face to us AUSTRALIAN PEOPLE , that we pay more than 20c/ltr for it. If our Govts prior had the sense to set up an AUSTRALIAN OWNED Plant and rigs, we wouldnt have 1/2 the emmissions we have today! We the Nation of AUSTRALIA need to get back to being AUSTRALIA instead of MULTI-NATIONAL CORP.INDUSTRIES owned! Taxing us for your penchant of supplying Corporate Welfare is RIDICULOUS!

Posted by: Nick Again, Maryborough

 

Friday, 18 July 2008

Why are you lot on LiveNews so god damn short sighted? Put the environment aside, oil price is going to sky rocket as it runs out in the next 50 to 100 years. We need to use something else, having a carbon trading system will force businesses to innovate to address oil consuming habit. For Australian companies to pull off this major economic transition, they need help, which is why the Rudd government is giving them help. There's nothing wrong with that.

Posted by: James Zhuo, Regents Park

Friday, 18 July 2008

James, your theory sounds good, except there is one shortfall - what are the economic (ie without pushing up prices) alternative energy sources right now? Punishing the business and the public by the carbon tax without providing alternative energy sources is irresponsible, just like most of Rudd's policies.

Posted by: W O, Turramurra

 
 

YOUR SAY




 


 

500 characters maximum. 500 characters left.


 

* Required field

 

YOUR SAY

For you information LoonyLance, I have posted on the media's left bias IN GENERAL. Or do you get to censor ? Considering you have only... susan lawe, gippsland on Nelson brushes leadership rumblings after by-election shockers

What a goose!! In my best Nelson Muntz voice, "HA HA"!!... Peter C, Sydney on Panda unable to bear hug from drunken zoo worker

Cant believe it we've now got a GG and a NGG.Somehow I think they are one and the same and its just a... Lance Freestone, Cambridge Park on Rees names new-look cabinet, promises sweeping changes

Unless they get rid of the public service department heads and private secretaries that are really running the state it will just be more of... Alan Perkins, Plumpton on NSW govt 'soap opera' is over: Rees

Same here Geoff, had 4 not posted from last night, plus someone stealing my name, and obviously without my email, gets posted. Live News you... susan lawe, gippsland on Nationals should walk out on the Coalition: Joyce