Macquarie Network ::: 2GB | 2CH | LIVENEWS | RUGBYLEAGUELIVE | WHAT CAREER | AMAZING AUSTRALIANS :::
Saturday, 06 September 2008

Smacked toddlers are suffering depression: Research

30/07/2008 6:23:00 PM.  | LIVENEWS.com.au

RELATED ARTICLES

LATEST FEATURES

New research has found three-year-olds are suffering from depression and anxiety, and there are claims smacking and yelling by parents is to blame.

A rise in mental illness in young people prompted the research – results showing parents who lash out at their kids are contributing to the problem.

The Murdoch Children's Research Institute study of 700 children has found stressed parents are lashing out at kids, fuelling abusive behaviour and setting them on a downward spiral.

The research revealed children who have tendencies to kick, hit and bite others, are usually the ones who were subjected to physical punishment from their parents at a young age.

The pressure stressed parents are putting on their children can have more serious outcomes later on, such as drug and alcohol abuse, unemployment, criminal activity and suicide.

Dr Jordana Bayer from the Murdoch Institute said smacking often related in behavioral problems for young children.

"We found that when toddler and pre-school children lived in families with lots of stress and yelling and smacking, they're more likely to develop behavioral and emotional problems by pre-school age," she said.

"I think that smacking's probably not the best way to manage behaviour."

COMMENTS

Wednesday, 30 July 2008

I got smacked, yelled at, and even got the belt as a kid and I'm not depressed, on drugs, abusing alcohol, unemployed, participate in criminal activity or anything else for that matter. The teenagers/adults with these problems that I see had the "new style" of discipline where you can't smack your kids you just have to talk to them. I see these kids growing up with no boundaries at all which that can't be good.

Posted by: Amanda L, Blacktown

 

Wednesday, 30 July 2008

The old adage "spare the rod and spoil the child" applied until the " let them do as they like, when and where they like" rules came in, along with the "you are not allowed to even say "no", let alone inflict any punishment".I cannot recall any "incidents" back then of the kind we have today - children armed with knives invading a school and knifing children there; mobs of children throwing stones at busses and trains; so may cases of arson by children etc. etc. What went wrong ?

Posted by: Geoff Cass, Tewantin Qld. 4565

Wednesday, 30 July 2008

What went wrong is we can no longer punish our children. If they throw a tantrum in a shop because we won't buy them a certain toy there is nothing we can do, you smack your kid in public, even lightly you get horrible horrible stares off people and quite often have security called (yes it happened- smacked my son lightly because he was throwing a tantrum and began throwing the store's things around so I smacked him and said no - security came up because of reports "I abused my child")

Posted by: Kalis Servo, Sydney

 
 

YOUR SAY




 


 

500 characters maximum. 500 characters left.


 

* Required field

 

YOUR SAY

He is NSW Labors "Joan Kirner" No one else wanted the job and they know they can't fix it because they have... Mike D, Bella Vista on Budget more bleak than expected: Rees

Frank, no offense but it's comments like yours that is so illogical. Are you saying overseas maintainance work is always inferior to those done by... W O, Turramurra on Fume filled flight adds to Qantas woes

What is the driver of Global Warming? No sure answer yet but maybe Geoff Bolton is right. It could be your big mouth.... A Narchy, The Hills on John Howard charges back into the political fray

How can you possibly make an inference such as this, without seemingly anything in support, and simultaneously complain about spin. Get real. Put... Mick S, Central Coast on Rees said yes to cannabis?

I guess you didn't really read it after all, darren carrow, or you're to stupid to have understood Dr Evan's whole point. They are: 1. The... A Narchy, The Hills on John Howard charges back into the political fray