Macquarie Network ::: 2GB | 2CH | LIVENEWS | STREET CORNER | RUGBYLEAGUELIVE | WHAT CAREER | AMAZING AUSTRALIANS :::
Friday, 09 January 2009

Chris Smith fires back at Fairfax

3/11/2008 4:54:00 PM.  | Chris Smith

RELATED ARTICLES

LATEST FEATURES

As some of you may know the Fairfax press had a go at me over the weekend, an article I managed to read just before coming to air today.

(I was flat-strap with the family over the weekend, and wasn’t keen on spending my two days off poring over ill-informed, spiteful garbage.)

Now this was always coming. Bear in mind I’ve given considerable time on my show recently to criticise Fairfax writer David Marr over his undying support for photographer Bill Henson.

So a square up was likely. That’s the way they work.

Anyway they squared up on page 3? On me! They are kidding.

What pathetic news judgement. No wonder the paper’s on its knees.

However, the article related to the hounding I copped, from two pathetic undergraduates - a now unemployed pair - who spent three months using a murderer’s email identity, to get stuck into me.

Plus, using a Pacific Islander identity, an angry emailer who threatened me. Of course we didn’t know who was sending these emails at the time.

How anyone would be of the mindset to use the alias of triple murderer, Sef Gonzales, to send any email is beyond me.

I still don’t get the joke in that and that was a concern for us on the show, the management here, and my family.

As for these emails from a Pacific Islander who said, for my comments, I was ‘goin’ down’ - that was a threat which needed to be treated seriously, as we’ve done in similar circumstances before.

I don’t intend mucking around with any threat, for the sake mainly of my young family.

At the time we suspected these emails, and a few others, were coming from the same quarter and it was only when the Sef emailer made two specific references, to two physical aspects of my home, that my wife and I, plus two private investigators I know and the police, agreed it was time to ascertain the seriousness of the messages.

Pretty simple; it could be a prank, it could be harmless, or it could be serious. Pass on the emails and we can find out. Simple.

That’s what I did and the two idiots were identified, questioned, and sacked by their employers Media Monitors.

“It was just a joke”, they said. Fair enough, we determined that, and my family were put at ease. That’s all I care about.

But now to the article: these two creeps, decided to hand over selected emails to writer David Marr.

There was no mention of another email, which focused on two physical aspects of our home, specific items. But why let the facts get in the way of a good story?

This was part of the reason why, in concert with 2GB, we informed the police. This is what took the emails to a personal and threatening level.

May I say though, that if I received a threat this afternoon, with or without a murderer’s identity or references to our home, I would hand it over to the police anyway. Period. Without hesitation.

I’ll do whatever it takes to err on the side of caution to protect my family.

The article also makes some outrageously ignorant claims.

I allegedly didn’t ‘get’ the Gonzales reference. But anyone here who knew what was going on, and there were at least six, knew who Gonzales was.

I’ve reported on his case about a dozen times and the email identity was of concern.

The article also makes mention of my hypocrisy over a photo of my kids on my personal website, which has them in a bath, suds to the shoulders, smiling like kids do in family photos.

And they thought it hypocritical that I criticise Henson’s photos. Spare me.

There’s a massive difference between my photo, and darkened shots of naked pubescent girls. I don’t think I need to explain that.

They also cited the fact, that I used a profanity to describe their messages. I don’t take back that description.

And I don’t take back the fact, that I wanted to ‘smack them in the mouth’. I certainly did, for the angst we felt, especially my wife.

And the sub-editors on the paper had the hide to head the story: SHOCK JOCK DUPED!

Duped? Yes, it turned out it was not a serious threat. I was cautious, maybe over-cautious. I’m very happy to accept that one.

But duped? Gee, what a good duping: threaten someone, mentioned aspects of their home, use a murderer’s identity, and laugh it off as just a great joke.

Well, comedy is a very weird thing then. But I’m glad it was a joke.

And I’m very glad, to have acted the way we did, with terrific support from management here, I might add.

But duped?

Hey you blokes at Fairfax, hey you two numbskulls in particular.

I’m not getting hassled or hilariously threatened by you two twits anymore, while you got sacked. So who got duped?

I know the answer to that one.

Bugger off.

 

Macquarie Radio Network owns LIVENEWS.com.au and 2GB

COMMENTS

Monday, 03 November 2008

Well done Chris, I'm sure that everyone who listens to you supports you and the decisions you made. I don' think that you could ever be too cautious with something like this. As for the two losers who wrote the emails, absolute scum, they should be blacklisted from the media industry.

Posted by: Mark B, Rose Bay

 

Tuesday, 04 November 2008

Boring little shock Jock if ever we heard one, i suppose this email will be handed over to the police.

Posted by: g maybury, sydney

 

Tuesday, 04 November 2008

Very well done, Chris. I don't read the SMH, so I only knew about the article courtesy of Andrew Bolt or Tim Blair (one of those two). I have got threatening mail in the past, possibly from one of them, and it is always good to hear how suck 'pranks' are stopped. It isn't funny. You were spot on on Henson and Marr. Props to the police for chasing them down.

Posted by: Happy Fun Ball, Carramar/Sydney

 

Tuesday, 04 November 2008

Chris, I think everyone respects you for doing what you did. It's a pity these drongos weren't named and shamed. And isn't it amazing that when someone comes unstuck they inevitably come up with the very tired and lame excuse "it was just a joke". Well this time the jokes on them. It's called poetic justice.

Posted by: colleen a, Sydney

 

Tuesday, 04 November 2008

Only letting supportive comments through Chris? Sign of a very think skin old chap. Then again, the entire screed you have indulged in is testament to the that. I see you have made the changes I pointed out though. Perhaps you should provide a bit of a more balanced response to Marr's views on the Henson affair as a classic moral panic, adn a bit less of a persoanl diatribe.

Posted by: darren carrow, brisbane

Tuesday, 04 November 2008

Darren do you think he actually reads comments made before they are published ? wake up and smell the coffee. I fully agree with ALL his comments on the above. as for SMH i dont think i would even wipe my bum with a rag like that. I am guessing you dont have a wife and kids and you agree with child porn (henson) or you must be mates with the low lifes that threatened him ( Hey but thats just my opinion)

Posted by: nigel williams, gymea

Tuesday, 04 November 2008

I can tell you that there were two comments on here last night, one of which was mine. Both were pulled after about 30 minutes, although the other one was pro-Smith. I then tried again and was not put up. A third comment pointed out grammatical and spelling errors. It was not put up, but the revisions were made. I should charge Smith an editing fee.

Posted by: darre carrow, brisbane

Wednesday, 05 November 2008

Carrow; I should charge YOU an editing fee; you can't even spell your own name correctly. Darren has an "n" at the end of the word. Have a look at how you spelt it in your last ranting. DO NOT EVER criticise anyone else for their spelling or grammar again; everyone you attack can at the very least spell their own name correctly. You are always too busy pointing out the splinter in others eyes to notice the old growth forest in your own.

Posted by: James H, United Socialist States of Australia

Wednesday, 05 November 2008

I believe it is known in the business as Muphry's law, that each time you pick someone up on their spelling/grammar, your pedantic communication will have at least one mistake. The example in your post, in the mangled version of the axiom, 'look not at the mote in God's eye, but attend to the beam in thine own', is that the word 'others' should possess an apostrophe, in the possessive sense. Anyway, pretty game to dicsuss names when your own is a badge of your extreme views and paranoia.

Posted by: darren carrow, brisbane

Wednesday, 05 November 2008

There you go again; you are not even man enough to give a nod when you have been found wanting at your own game. Instead; you hit straight back and attack the person, not the opinion. For the record; I meant exactly what I said; I don't need the likes of you who can't even spell your own name correctly to circum guess what I say. I also believe in the business it is actually called a spelling mistake; or a typo. Either way; the irony is you did it berating a journalist for HIS spelling. Goose!!

Posted by: James H, United Socialist States of Australia

Wednesday, 05 November 2008

James, I think the irony is that Smith didn't publish my comment, but did make the changes I pointed out in his rant. Calling him a journalist is putting it a bit high I think. And you might want to explain the phrase, 'circum guess what I say'. See ya.

Posted by: darren carrow, brisbane

 

Tuesday, 04 November 2008

G maybury - lets have someone threaten your family and see how you react you drongo - then again you are probably the type who couldnt care less. Let me assure you that you cross the line when you threaten peoples families and the consequence that these 2 suffered is little compared to having your family living in fear

Posted by: Tony M, Bangor

 

Tuesday, 04 November 2008

Good on ya Chris, I always look forward to listening to you. Hopefully you can put this behind you soon enough, just take care mate as there are quite a few dodgy characters around as you can see with some of the other posts here. Unfortunately when you are in the public eye, (mainly ear) you can become a target unfortunately your family got dragged in. Pretty sick stuff. GOOD LUCK MATE

Posted by: Bart R, Sydney

 

Wednesday, 05 November 2008

Chris Smith, shock jocks in general, and agro journalists are known to take things too far sometimes. In this world it's sometimes too late to know if an incident is a joke or serious. When family also get referenced that's towards the serious side of things. Who can forget the Shannon Noll - Wil Anderson incident and "joke" from a few years ago. Perhaps more thought needs to go into whether an article is appropriate or if a joke is funny? Pushing the limits go with the territory.

Posted by: Greg Tingle, North Bondi

 

Wednesday, 05 November 2008

Chris, I know you have crocodile skin but I just want to reiterate my emphatic support for you not just as a person but as a media broadcaster of such high integrity and a tireless professional work ethic. How dare those bloody mongrels try to maim and discredit you, your name and reputation, not to mention your beloved children? Fair dinkum, if I saw those vermin, I would bloody wring their necks and give them endless upper cuts until they're black and blue all over. Gee, I'm bloody filthy!

Posted by: Dorita *, Sydney

 
 

YOUR SAY




 


 

500 characters maximum. 500 characters left.


 

* Required field

 
LiveNews now available on mobile devices

YOUR SAY

cont. but then again USA invaded a sovereign nation like Iraq saying there were Weapons of Mass Destruction so I dont know whose worst... JHWWH Party, Australia on UN halts aid to Gaza over safety fears

When you know people who work for the ATO and hear what their day consists of, looking for a productivity increase of 3.25% (not a... Tim Williams, Penrith on Govt slashes over 100 ATO jobs: union

disperse them among East & North Sydney... tru blu, Greenwich on Rosemeadow brawlers to be evicted

Can you imagine the shock and horror if 800 Israelis were killed by Palestinians!... Poisen Pen, Sydney on UN halts aid to Gaza over safety fears

Where you been, Traci? Susan will be pleased you're back !... Observer JWH Party, Australia on Australian atheists banned from bus blitz