Macquarie Network ::: 2GB | 2CH | LIVENEWS | STREET CORNER | RUGBYLEAGUELIVE | WHAT CAREER | AMAZING AUSTRALIANS :::
Saturday, 10 January 2009

Private child-care fails our kids

21/11/2008 1:00:00 PM.  | Tim Brunero

Another day, another child-care conglomerate goes belly up, another facebook message from a friend at the ‘Nationalise ABC Child-care’ facebook group.

Today it’s CFK, which runs 43 centres with 4000 kids, that has failed.

Surely it must be time for Kevin Rudd, who after all pours $2.5 billion a year into subsidising child-care centres, to realise that either private sector operators need to be punted or regulation needs to be improved.

Surely we can have more of a say in what they say is the most subsidised sector in Australia.

With that kind of investment (50% of private sector child-care income comes from our taxpayer subsidies) Rudd could either start his own centres, favour funding for the not-for-profit sector or insist on stringent regulation.

If you compare the incredible regulation of either the private health or aged care industry to the almost non-existent regime for child-care industry it’s obvious something needs to change.

Certainly Howard’s cosy regime that meant former Howard Minister for Children and Youth Affairs Larry Anthony sat on the ABC Learning Centre board - a board chaired by former Liberal Brisbane mayor Sallyanne Atkinson - needs to be revised.

An environment that saw ABC Learning Centres concentrating on expanding rather than caring for children under a billion dollar mountain of debt – it currently has 25% of the market with some 1075 centres and 120,000 kids.

An environment which saw, according to industry insiders, ABC learning Centres buying up high-quality child-care centres and then cutting costs leading to the parents pullins their kids and the centres going into the red.

An environment which saw ABC Learning Centres use bully boy tactics against unions and other voices of dissent – throwing around legal threats at the drop of a hat.

An environment where the Howard Government removed capital fundng support from the community based child care system - which meant its sustainable model couldn't expand into growth suburbs.

An environment which meant ABC could weave its company books into an indecipherable web of trusts, subsidiaries and inter-related companies that left anyone looking into its affairs scratching their heads.

An environment that has put $20 million in ABC staff entitlements in jeopardy – they must line up behind the big banks if the company is liquidated.

With the breaking of this private sector spell surely it is time the Government considered going back to the community-dominated child-care centre model of three decades ago.

After all a recent report by The Australia Institute found non-profit centres provided better care with more nutritious food, variety of equipment, staff time with children and a better staff to children ratio.

Or perhaps, shock horror, it could decide to run some centres itself.

Or at the very least it could apply the lesson of the World Financial Crisis – that a failure to regulate does no favours to the market – it just makes it easier for fast talking South African corporate cowboys to do themselves, and our kids, a mischief.

COMMENTS

Thursday, 20 November 2008

Hey wait a minute. How can you lump all private childcare centres in with the likes of ABC, and CFK. Both expanded far more than they should have, they got greedy, just like the big banks. We own a 50 place centre, and are trying to make an honest living as well as a great place for the local children. The sweeping judgements made in this article are offensive to all private businesses who have struggled along, with ABC as a massive competitor. Too greedy, get bailed out, makes me sick!

Posted by: Julie Olsen, castle hill

Thursday, 20 November 2008

And that's exactly why we need regulation Julie so great hands on operators like you can flourish. Good on you.

Posted by: Tim Brunero, Sydney

 

Thursday, 20 November 2008

The fault is not with independent child care operators. Child care is essential and the problems of the issue highlight the nature of Rudd's promise in the election campaign on the issue .. not the nature of the business. Had the US not fallen in a heap due to corrupt practise of the US Democrats this would not be an issue. It isn't about greed. It is about spinning to divert from the issue of the needs of parents and the broken promise of Rudd.

Posted by: Happy Fun Ball, Carramar/Sydney

Thursday, 20 November 2008

Really Fun Ball sometimes I just have to bite. Howard looked after Child Care for 12 years - ABC was on the rocks at least as far back as February - it's just disingenuous to blame it on Rudd . Oh and it's one thing to be a die hard conservative - it another thing to never be able to admit that Eddy Groves fast and loose approach did not work. Blaming his downfall on US Democrats just makes you look silly.

Posted by: Tim Brunero, Sydney

Thursday, 20 November 2008

during howards reign i saw many private child care operators close down due to lack of funding from the government. there were not enough places for children. if you wanted a place you had to make sure that you booked your child in when you first found out you were pregnant. I am glad i no longer need child care.

Posted by: Belinda Hummie, New lambton

Thursday, 20 November 2008

Tim, what I think Ball is saying is that businesses that were "marginal" have fallen over as a result of the US sub-prime crisis. Groves was wrong. There are many more businesses still to fall. I don't think Ball is "blaming" Rudd in total, but some of us feel that Rudd's eagerness to "talk down" the economy when he came into office (inflation genie et al), and now his eagerness to (possibly) over-react, are symptomatic of a PM that is better at "knee jerk" than prudent management? (spin?)

Posted by: Geoffrey Bolton, Lane Cove

Thursday, 20 November 2008

Thank you Geoffrey. I think you read me accurately. I guess Tim had to bite, or accept that his jaundiced position had been undermined by my valid argument. The fact is that when you disagree with a lefty you become an evil person .. a demon. I didn't write all that Tim inferred. But there is great truth to it.

Posted by: Happy Fun Ball, Carramar/Sydney

Thursday, 20 November 2008

Bolts you must be desparate aligning yourself with that useless unemployed teacher.Groves will be shown to be as good a mgr as some of your other herores like Bond ,Adler(father/son) George Herscu just to name a few.The spin you have written in this post trying to associate Rudd with ABC reminds me of that great spinner now departed that ranted and raved and was replaced by David Oldfield.Perhaps you should switch stations and listen to your mentor and take your aliases with you.

Posted by: Lance Freestone,

Thursday, 20 November 2008

Bolts: Don't blame it totally on Groves! His biggest problem was believing that if he put two prominent Liberals on ABC Board it would be a recipe for Economic Success!! Well it wasn't was it?

Posted by: Paul Keating, Dapto

Thursday, 20 November 2008

Happy fun oddball ,are you nuts ? Democrats are not at fault for the sub prime lending crisis in the U.S . The lenders are at fault for letting people borrow beyond their capacity to repay in a fluctuating market .As for Australian child care ,with so many families relying on double incomes to repay their home loans Government intervention is a must to keep these centre's operational . Your living in a bubble oddball , an obtuse ,liberal bubble.

Posted by: slick 6, WA

Thursday, 20 November 2008

Freestone, you must be reading a different entry, I said "Groves was wrong". How stupid are you? Where did I associate Rudd with ABC? You are derranged. Even Dapto got it right! You, Freestone are a fool.

Posted by: Geoff Bolton, Lane Cove

 

Thursday, 20 November 2008

Hey Tim. Just want to let you know that this is one more article of yours that I did not read.

Posted by: Happy Stein, Earlwood

Thursday, 20 November 2008

Stop toying with me big boy ;-)

Posted by: Tim Brunero, Sydney

 

Thursday, 20 November 2008

Good on you Julie some of these commentors have no idea how the system works. Have they ever heard of the National Childcare Accrediation Authority which regulates whether a centre receives fee relief. These regulations are very difficult to comply with and then there is DOCS. If you can survive all this then try to get your centre full by being the best their is competitive with your fees while watching your council authorise more centres in an overcrowded area. Now try to make a profit?

Posted by: PETER LANGLEY, SYDNEY

 

Thursday, 20 November 2008

There was talk from the Whitlam Government in 1973 that they were going to take over the pre-schools.

Posted by: Rob Banks, Canberra

 

Thursday, 20 November 2008

yes peter its not simple and its not cheap. it cost alot to run these centres. you need a lot of staff, and even then you cannot pay the staff a great deal. maybe tim would like to pay a visit to one of these centres to see what is involved in the running of one

Posted by: Belinda Hummie, New lambton

 

Thursday, 20 November 2008

Eddy Groves was just too greedy in the end he was doing fine in Australia until wanting to expand in the US and then the crunch came..there are too many of them in some areas and not enough where required and the councils will approve almost anything (location or land size and busy streets) because it involves development fees without any thought going into planning or environmental impact it has.

Posted by: Fair Dinkum ,, ,

 

Thursday, 20 November 2008

I reckon we should nationalise the whole childcare industry, like Castro would. It would lead to less ideological dislocation when the kids move into the left wing hothouse of Primary and High School (did you know that teachers are highly unionised ? shock horror) and would give them a good grounding for when they finally get to the socialist paradise of University where we know little Che's are only interested in blowing the student union funding on red flags.

Posted by: darren carrow, brisbane

Thursday, 20 November 2008

(Apart from the first phrase), the most sensible and realistic contribution from Sparrow I've seen in months!

Posted by: Geoff Bolton, Lane Cove

Thursday, 20 November 2008

I was confirdent that irony would never be lost on one as astute as yourself Boltsen.

Posted by: darren carrow, brisbane

 

Thursday, 20 November 2008

It would be great for the media to accept their portion of the blame for the current childcare crisis - they are simply making a difficult situation far worse with the mis-reporting of events. As all people with half a brain know, the media don't let the truth get in the way of a good story. So Tim, get the facts right about the failure of ABC and CFK, and if you can't do math, don't write the story. Better to not inform than misinform. Oh, that may mean you are out of a job...

Posted by: peter r, alexandria

Thursday, 20 November 2008

So all that peter and you don't even tell us what the truth is! Such a tease. Or is it just that you are lazy? Don't worry about tim's job - just do yours as a commenter and make some sense.

Posted by: Ian Engleton, Schofields

 

Thursday, 20 November 2008

Anyone who believes centres are not regulated needs to spend some time in a centre. NCAC, DoCs, CCB Compliance Teams, licensing checks, spot checks and CCMS. Now my staff and I get to watch the taxes we have paid be used to bail out the very competitors who roared through our local suburbs buying any centre they could. Spending amounts on advertising, equipment and living the high life we could only dream about. Did anyone offer any lifelines during the lean times, no we simply worked harder.

Posted by: Diane Lyons, Sydney

 

Friday, 21 November 2008

The child care crisis is a further example of how the neocons have basically let profit become their numero uno. The changes that howard and co bought down to favour their rich corporate mates will now have to be paid for by the taxpayer. As the eco crisis deepens we are going to see more and more examples of this. Regulate these industries just as Howard regulated the labour movement.

Posted by: Carty Sagnor, Melbourne

 

Saturday, 22 November 2008

In Our experiences with Day care centers, ( 4 kids),We found it better to do the minding ourselves. Our benefits recieved from Day car centers...head lice ; School Sores; gastro, More headlice and then More sores which resembled something like a sore from " Staff".( golden). End result was to pul lour last 2 out of day care, I threw in my job and am Still looking after our last child. Then it took us forever to work out what was going on with fee's, fees owed etc. What a joke. System sucks!!

Posted by: Nick Again, Maryborough

 

Friday, 28 November 2008

the right still continue to scrape the bottom of the barrel of excuses for the gfc. unable to accept responsibilty for their own appalling behavoir is typical of their moral cowardice. theyll be blaming christopher colombus next. what a sad dishonest bunch

Posted by: don ward, bankstown

Friday, 28 November 2008

Ward: The GFC had its roots in the socialist dreams of Carter and Clinton (but not rectified by Bush). Bank regulatory situation here in Australia is good (thanks in large part to Costello, Keating & others). To try and link the GFC with the "right" in Australia is childlishly pathetic. Anyway, can't understnd why you made this entry against this particular story? Perhaps you attend a childcare centre!

Posted by: Geoff (centre) Bolton, Lane Cove (heart of middle Australia)

 
 

YOUR SAY




 


 

500 characters maximum. 500 characters left.


 

* Required field