Macquarie Network ::: 2GB | 2CH | LIVENEWS | STREET CORNER | RUGBYLEAGUELIVE | WHAT CAREER | AMAZING AUSTRALIANS :::
Saturday, 10 January 2009

Qantas flight cancelled minutes before takeoff

22/11/2008 6:15:00 PM.  | AAP
A New Zealand-bound Qantas flight had to be aborted minutes before takeoff when wing damage was discovered by an engineer at Sydney airport.

The Christchurch-bound Qantas 747-300 was taxiing towards the runway at 9.15am (AEST) Saturday, when an engineer noticed damage to its right wing flap.

The engineer notified the pilot, who aborted the flight.

Qantas said all 213 passengers on the plane have been provided with accommodation and meal vouchers, and booked on another flight on Sunday morning.

The cause of the damage is being assessed, a spokeswoman for the airline said.

The aborted flight is the latest mishap in recent months to plague the flying kangaroo.

In July a Qantas 747 had its belly torn open when an oxygen tank exploded on a flight over Manila, sparking an Australian Transport Safety Bureau investigation.

And in October a Qantas plane suffered a dramatic midair plunge on a flight from Singapore to Perth, where the plane fell 200 metres in 20 seconds, hurling unrestrained passengers around the cabin.

About 40 passengers were taken to hospital after the plane made an emergency landing in Learmonth, near Exmouth in Western Australia's north.

COMMENTS

Saturday, 22 November 2008

Who in the hell services these planes! Tom and Jerry!? No way in the world I will fly Qantas after all this crap! I will stick to the Manly ferry! I rest my case!

Posted by: The Sword, Panania

Saturday, 22 November 2008

The Sword, You got it on one. NO ONE SERVICES THESE PLANES. They are grubby and badly maintained, and the profits go to the shareholders. They have been on this slippery slope now for many years and now it is coming back in spades. These days one has to choose the airline and plane type very carefully. I walked away from Qantas years ago when they would not listen or reply to written comments.

Posted by: Andy Mac, HK

Saturday, 22 November 2008

Mac, on what do you base the assertion "nobody services these planes". Do you have any facts? evidence? or are you just another Qantas hater?

Posted by: Geoff Bolton, Lane Cove

Sunday, 23 November 2008

I note that Andy is from HK; most Australians won't be aware of some of the piles of junk that China put into the sky. Apart from Cathay and Dragon; you wouldn't even recommend GH or Sparrow to fly on the others. Some of the planes are so old; the Wright Bros are pilot and Co pilot. I fly many airlines in many countries and Qantas is only just behind Singapore and Thai as the best airline to fly; followed closely by Malaysian. Emirates is the most opulent and just needs more routes and planes.

Posted by: Fair Minded Aussie, Australia

Sunday, 23 November 2008

For you information I fly around 30 trips a year. I had around 500,000 Qantas points, so I do know the airline. Qantas is not even a top five airline. As for China airlines, they have crews and planes as good Qantas. Cathay and Dragon airs reservation system is as bad as Qantas. The issue here is poor maintenance, and dirty planes and entertainment systems that do not work. Its my money I spend it where I get service, reliability, and aircraft that I know are safe and clean. Not Qantas.

Posted by: Andy Mac, HK

 

Saturday, 22 November 2008

What is it with Australian media and their preocupation with reporting anything and everything negative about our airline? Other airlines have no problems? I find it hard to believe. Yes ! we want to know. But don't let us think that all other airlines are safer. I am a nervy passenger anyway. We are all very concerned about the safety. Problem was discovered and fixed. Why not praise our engineers for job well done? They are great. Isn't it what this is all about?

Posted by: Poison Pen, Sydney

 

Saturday, 22 November 2008

Those dasdardly union blokes just trying to make QANTAS mgt look bad.As if that would be hard.The damage done to this once great airline by the GREEDISGOODITES( sorry Hendo call me Julie Bishop ) is a disgrace and a reminder to all Labor voters of the values we hold .Dixon should be put in a hole right next to Howard.We dont need to wait for either to pass.

Posted by: Lance Freestone,

Saturday, 22 November 2008

Thanks for the acknowledgment Lance, that is so not like Julie Bishop. I am happy for any of my work here to be reproduced and used by anyone. But thank you anyway.

Posted by: Graeme Henderson, Darling Downs

Sunday, 23 November 2008

For the record the "GREED IS GOOD" has been plagiarised from the movie starring Michael Douglas as the fictional character Gordon Gecko in "Wall Street", it is not Graeme Henderson's and he deserves no thanks for it Lance Freestone as you have mentioned (it is plagiarised!), when used in a fictional manner ie put in Gecko like terms - as opposed to HONEST, COMPETITION, AMBITION and HARD WORK - GREED IS BAD!!!! "GREEDISGOOD-[ITES]", isn't there a law accepting praise for something that isn't yours?

Posted by: Chris Ng, ,

Sunday, 23 November 2008

How dumb would you have to be to say that 3 words; Greed Is Good, are the same as 1 word, GREEDISGOODITE. And then how much dumber would you have to be to publicly admit you were so stupid that you could not tell the difference. And then to actually attack someone on the basis of that stupidity would show you to be totally moronic. I seriously doubt anyone could be that stupidly pathetic. They would have to have no shame and no brain, it just wouldn't happen in the real world. Would it, could it

Posted by: Graeme Henderson, Darling Downs

Sunday, 23 November 2008

There is no such word as GREEDISGOOD{ITE} in any language now matter how hard you try to defend yourself! GREED IS GOOD are the words (putting together the same words shows no initiative on your part - it's called plagiarism and taken from the movie "Wall Street'). It is you who should be ashamed for publicly exposing yourself! Taking credit for something that doesn't belong to you is theft!

Posted by: Chris Ng, ,

 

Saturday, 22 November 2008

This is a joke Qantas where is the CEO Dixon and what is he doing about sending damage aircraft into the skies. Its all about money and the shareholders he couldn't care less and that shows with all these incidents occuring daily. Qantas should be grounded until ever aircraft is checked independently.

Posted by: g maybury, sydney

Saturday, 22 November 2008

Maybury. Dixon isn't the CEO. Where have you been....asleep as usual?

Posted by: Geoff Bolton, Lane Cove

Saturday, 22 November 2008

My apologies Maybury....Dixon is the CEO for another 6 days!

Posted by: Geoff Dixon, Terminal 1

Saturday, 22 November 2008

As usual Bolts you are the one asleep you fool.Alan Joyce DOES NOT takeover from Dixon until 28 Nov .Now stay out of things you dont understand.

Posted by: Lance Freestone,

Sunday, 23 November 2008

Lance you got it wrong, it's Joyce Alan.

Posted by: Paul Trood, Southport

Sunday, 23 November 2008

Now Bolts would this be the hindsight you used to criticise Glen Stevens and the RBA.It seems your current fuhrer is a fan of hindsight must be a Liberal trait.I will accept your compliment on intellectual vision on behalf of uncle Kevin and myself.

Posted by: Lance Freestone,

 

Saturday, 22 November 2008

Freelance, you will observe the apology that I posted. You will also be aware that Joyce is running the show at present. Go get a life.

Posted by: Geoff Bolts-Dixon, Lane Cove

 

Saturday, 22 November 2008

Did Dixon service this plane,if he did why didnt he notice the damage before it was ready to take off.I could not imagine that the engineers would have seviced it and let it get as far as nearly taking off would they,surley not if so I think that would be the biggest worry would it not.

Posted by: D K, Brisbane

Saturday, 22 November 2008

DK, it's not the CEO's duty to service a plane personally as you know they would have others to do the job and it looks like this didn't happen which is difficult to believe...as for freestone's pathetic comments, Joyce was appointed in July 2008 as CEO and has been working alongside Dixon for the past 4 months to ensure a smooth transition into the position ....and if there are problems then it's the new CEO not the outgoing CEO that needs to sort the problems out...savvy peanut brain!

Posted by: glen smith, gpark

Saturday, 22 November 2008

As a wannabe lickspittle CEO yourself Boltsen you should know that the anagram stands for Chief (top dog - buck stops here) Executive (decision making function) Officer. Of course he doesn'r personally service the planes. But if he makes the decision to start a waterfront style war with the engineers and their union, and to cut back on the maintenance program, in the interests of paying himself an even more obscene paypacket, then he ahs to wear the consequences. All of them. Period.

Posted by: darren carrow, brisbane

Sunday, 23 November 2008

Interesting Sparrow, didn't the "waterfront dispute" drag this country's waterfront rom the 19th to the 20th century? Wasn't that a good thing, or do you support the rorts and inefficiencies that people like Ambrose are so proud of?

Posted by: Geoff Bolton, Lane Cove

Sunday, 23 November 2008

The inefficiencies etc on the waterfront was Howard propaganda, which was propogated to provide justification for the terror tactics used by Costigan/Howard/Reith. I see you have swallowed this whole in your usual uncritical fashion. You may also care to reflect on the principle of the end not justifying the means. Even is change were necessary, is is 19th century for the bosses to send in the scabs under the protection of hired muscle with attack dogs.

Posted by: darren carrow, brisbane

Sunday, 23 November 2008

Sparrow I'm not sure if the best fit descripto for your ideas is deluded or demented, but I take some solcae from the line which reads "even if change is necessary". Nobody with a functioning brain could argue that reform was long overdue. Howard's government fixed that. We now have a waterfron that is not the trade inhibitor that it was. I am sure you will dredge up some irrelevancy to continue the argument, but your true colours are showing. Where's Ambrose when you need him, he worked there!

Posted by: Geoff Bolton, Lane Cove

Sunday, 23 November 2008

The hopelessly soft soaped kid glove 'Howard Years' on ABC at least revealed that the Rodent was up to his eyebrows in a criminal conspiracy to break the waterfront, with the idiot giggling Reith as his patsy. Perhaps if the Libs had spent more energy on upgrading the antiquated infrastucture on the watwerfront we wouldn't still have the bottlenecks we have today. MUA here to stay! But back to topic, is surgery going to be necessary to remove you from Dixon next week? You seem very attached.

Posted by: darren carrow, bribane

Sunday, 23 November 2008

Attn the goose with the peanut brain from gpark.Whilst Joyce may have been named as the incoming CEO his appt will not occur until 28 NOV.Accordingly Dixon will be responsible until that time.To say that its Joyce's problem to sort out the legacy of Dixon's mismanagement shows what a delinquent you are .You say Joyce has been working alongside Dixon to ensure a smooth transition.Do you mean a smooth transition of planes running into one another,incidents of poor maintenance daily.You are kidding

Posted by: Lance Freestone,

Sunday, 23 November 2008

freestone from cpark, they are not my words....this is what was reported ...get back to your caring duties instead of bludging, bludger! my previous comments weren't posted by livenews however your abuse was!

Posted by: glen smith, gpark

Sunday, 23 November 2008

"$11 billion takeover offer from a consortium led by Macquarie Bank.Geoff Dixon, rejected the conditions of the $5.50-a-share takeover proposal as "not acceptable"."Airline Partners declined to make any public comment. It only confirmed it would remain majority Australian owned, with the investment firms Allco Equity Partners, Allco Finance Group and Macquarie having a collective 60 per cent stake."the airline will not be affected by any collapse or fire sale by Allco, as it has a "right of quiet possession" deal that will mean its arrangements continue regardless". Lance Freestone you need to be more factual instead of making up your own stories.

Posted by: Chris Ng, ,

Sunday, 23 November 2008

it's a pity that only livenews wants to use your brainless comments freestone..it goes to show that the moderators show bias towards your pathetic fictional stories!

Posted by: glen smith, gpark

Sunday, 23 November 2008

Smith oustanding reply.So all carers are bludgers eh .Typical of ignorant people like yourself.Just in case you are not smart enough to realise many carers like myself work as well ,as I have done for the past 35 yrs.I dont want a medal I am happy to see the smile on my brothers face every morning when I get him out of bed,dress him ,feed him and wipe his arse.Peanuts like you usually have the same size heart.Lesson for you, if you dont know anything dont open your mouth and leave no doubt.

Posted by: Lance Freestone,

Sunday, 23 November 2008

freestone I didn't call ALL carers bludgers just you (I'm not ignorant as you suggest the reason why I can say it as I speak from experience).If you only feed you brother once and wipe is arse once (your words not mine) you are not a carer. You mate are a bludger and claim something that you are not. A real carer does 24 hour care around the clock, they are the unsung heroes or heroines.Don't like the taste of your own medicine then think before belittle someone, you for one should no better!

Posted by: glen smith, gpark

Sunday, 23 November 2008

http://money.ninemsn.com.au/article.aspx?id=666555 there you go guys,dixon backed it strongly if you must know. its there in the artical.""It didn't happen, and I'm very pleased now it didn't happen," Dixon told the Sunday Telegraph. "The real issue I'd never repeat was having the management -- myself and the management -- involved in it." read the rest of it. do a bit of research Ng before quoting stuff and name calling. it doesnt sit well.

Posted by: Belinda Hummie, New lambton

Monday, 24 November 2008

Belinda Hummie point to where I called someone any names before you make those assertions, I quoted from a paper (the Herald) also, if Dixon lied that is his problem not mine or if the Paper misquoted him they lied...Dixon emphatically stated he did not back it, so who do you believe if one paper says one thing and the other says another, just like politicians one day they will say they didn't and the next day they have ....think about it. Wht you found is not the same as previously indicated.

Posted by: Chris Ng, ,

Monday, 24 November 2008

My deepest apologies Chris everyone else was name calling but you. late night got to me i guess. no excuses sorry. anyway that was the latest quote i could find on the subject. if you would like me to look for another artical i will let me know. weird isnt it that one paper says one thing and another says something else? oh well each to there own hey. this one was dated this month. all the others were 2007. no hard feelings.

Posted by: Belinda Hummie, New lambton

 

Saturday, 22 November 2008

Geoff Dixon really fixed this airline. If he had any integrity he would hand back his pay and apologize. The new manager will be well qualified to continue turning this once great airline into a joke. CASA also has some explaining to do. CASA needs a total clean out, too many cosy relationships.

Posted by: Graeme Henderson, Darling Downs

Sunday, 23 November 2008

I don't normally agree with you Hendo but you sure got this right. Dixon is a leach who's management skills are floored. Two Australian banks actually cite his management style as one never to be adopted by themselves. Mainly because of his US and THEM mentality.

Posted by: Paul Trood, Southport

Sunday, 23 November 2008

Can Bolts explain to us about Allco Finance.Yea thats the mob that were going to buyout QANTAS and pay Dixon a mint for his support.Where are they now ?They are in voluntary administration less than 12mths after DIXON recommended the buyout .Where would QANTAS be now if shareholders had not voted it down.Its scum like DIXON that the GREEDISGOODITES(courtesy HENDO) cheer on from the sidelines and defend.If an accident does happen and I sincerely hope it doesn't then Dixon will be responsible.

Posted by: Lance Freestone,

Sunday, 23 November 2008

"$11 billion takeover offer from a consortium led by Macquarie Bank.Geoff Dixon, rejected the conditions of the $5.50-a-share takeover proposal as "not acceptable"."Airline Partners declined to make any public comment. It only confirmed it would remain majority Australian owned, with the investment firms Allco Equity Partners, Allco Finance Group and Macquarie having a collective 60 per cent stake."the airline will not be affected by any collapse or fire sale by Allco, as it has a "right of quiet possession" deal that will mean its arrangements continue regardless". Lance Freestone you need to be more factual instead of making up your own stories.

Posted by: Chris Ng, ,

Sunday, 23 November 2008