Macquarie Network ::: 2GB | 2CH | LIVENEWS | STREET CORNER | RUGBYLEAGUELIVE | WHAT CAREER | AMAZING AUSTRALIANS :::
Saturday, 10 January 2009

Kevin's first year report card

24/11/2008 7:37:00 PM.  | Tim Brunero

RELATED ARTICLES

LATEST FEATURES

In the era of the professional politician our Kevin seems to be writing the textbook. Sure he’s no Gough, he’s no Kennet, and he’s certainly no Keating but then he probably won’t go down in a screaming heap like them either.

Kev’s first year has been nerdy but measured. Some would say cold, precise and almost well, reserved.

So let’s start at the beginning.

This is a guy who did all the stuff he could do straight away.

Not just to hit the ground running and give the impression of action, but to make sure things like ‘the sorry’ were as far away as possible from the next election so as not to annoy voters who hate it.

He did all the symbolic stuff. Ratifying Kyoto, abolishing WorkChoices, appointing Julia as the first ever Deputy PM and ushering in the country’s first female Governor-General.

All of these tickle the party base – the people who leaders ignore all election in the search for the middle ground but who get sunburnt and abused all polling day handing out the machine men’s ‘focus grouped to death’ pamphlets and how-to-votes.

So that was out of the way. Then came the 2020 Summit – what better way to make a whole lot of influential people - and I can tell you the heavy-hitters were there in abundance - feel invested in your government? Genius.

And at the same time came the reviews. Now people might sneer at the over 100 policy reviews Kev has commissioned - people like Tony Abbott who acerbically commented Rudd had “hit the ground reviewing”.

But think about it?

If you have to face the election in three years time you don't want to spend all the pork too far out – better to tell voters about the big bridge or port or road they’re gunna get when you’re about to ask them to give you another term.

And if you’re going to make big changes, don’t you need to do the policy work first, lest you be accused of poor preparation?

So where are we up to? That’s right, the reviewing. So after the reviewing came the doing.

He got some computers into schools, he doubled university scholarships, dumped billions into aged care and entitlements, created half a million new training places for young people, gave parents a childcare tax rebate and scrapped fees for desperately needed childcare trainees.

He cut taxes, opened 260 new childcare centres, got solar panels and water tanks in schools, dropped $22 billion into transport, got troops out of Iraq, helped first home buyers and renters, put the microscope on Howard’s desperate Northern Territory intervention and got out there and chased those Japanese whalers.

And most spectacularly of all he told off China, in China, in Chinese.

And, of course, throughout his first year, Rudd also defined himself by his incredible work ethic – something no Liberal, because they think they have a monopoly on enterprise and hard work, can attack.

Even though many would argue it could be counterproductive.

But he did make some mistakes. There was no need to go on and on about Bill Henson the way he did – he’s better than that kind of free kick populism.

He seems to be following Howard’s lead on defence - i.e. buying jets that don’t exist and other assets that we can’t use.

He refused to tax superannuation for the over 60s, he’s allowed Julia to denigrate our education system without offering proper money to fix it and seems to support a model where parents can access school data so they can ‘shop’ for schools.

Also that $20 million he’s going to give to big private schools to take indigenous kids on scholarship stinks. What’s wrong with better funding public schools?

Anyway, finally at the other end of his year he had a good old fashioned crisis, like Howard’s Port Arthur massacre or Bush’s September 11, but arguably bigger than both.

And he weighed in decisively – dumping over $10 billion into the economy. Sure the decision to guarantee all bank deposits was a bit ill conceived - but you can hardly accuse him of being a pussy.

So ends the first year of Kev – the man who may prove to be the most uninspiring, but precise leader we’ve ever had.

COMMENTS

Monday, 24 November 2008

Hey timbo, you've omitted the bits about killing the solar industry and the trimming of baby bonus and all the other pinching from the (supposedly rich) and giving to the poor in mass handouts for xmas... Also while Kev might have a good work ethic I hardly think sitting on planes as working hard. I've seen more pictures of him waving from planes and on tv crapping out financial advice than doing actual work. Also don't forget the dumping of $10 billion into the economy will leave the bank dry.

Posted by: Tom Jones, Manly

Monday, 24 November 2008

thanx Tom, see you at the one nation meeting on wed nite

Posted by: mr magoo, waringah

Monday, 24 November 2008

Sorry I'll have to turn down the invite... I'm not much of a fan of you one nation people.

Posted by: Tom Jones, Manly

Monday, 24 November 2008

So Tom your position is that the $10 billion capital injection is wrong?

Posted by: Tim Brunero, Sydney

Monday, 24 November 2008

Well lets look at what it's made up of... $4.8B for the pension which was something that needed to happen regardless of the financial meltdown and is $28/week for the pensioner wasn't there calls for a $30/week increase before the meltdown... so we'll take that out, that leaves with what it really is a $5B stimulus package. $1.5B for first home buyers, great idea to tempt people who perhaps shouldn't go into the market to take the plunge on a declining prices.

Posted by: Tom Jones, Manly

Monday, 24 November 2008

(cont) So that leaves the $3.9B of pre-xmas handouts to families on tax benefit A which is fine if you want to artificially inflate retail figures over the next 2 quarters but what happens after that...? the retail figures will take a huge single dive instead of multiple smaller ones or can the gov continue to doll out billions every quarter to "the battler"...? the only good thing to come out of it is $187M for training places... These training places I wouldn't count as economic reform.

Posted by: Tom Jones, Manly

Monday, 24 November 2008

What would you have spent it on Tom? Would you have spent it at all?

Posted by: Tim Brunero, Sydney

Monday, 24 November 2008

Tim, who does Krudds package resemble a Stimulus, in an economy that feeds anothers country's growth? If we ahd a wide span of Manufacture, I could understand. All we do if we rush out and spend, is spur on the Trade deficit. I dont think Krudd has given too much thought to it. Krudd would have done better to open up Mass Training for Jobs open on the market, or start new ones, on a mass scale, similar to national service. make the country work building Infrastructure.

Posted by: Nick Again, maryborough

Monday, 24 November 2008

Sorry Tim this isn't a game of what if, what if I got to decide or what if the coalition was in...? This is judging the decisions of labor and some if their decisions aren't that thought through aka the deposit guarantee and some are purely to buy votes at the next election... $1000 per child is a lot of money for anyone and they won't forget that by next election. How about an actual tax break for all...? if it's purely meant to be spent and to boost the economy why not everyone...?

Posted by: Tom Jones, Manly

 

Monday, 24 November 2008

365 days - $22billion surplus gone - Grade F Minus

Posted by: Repeat Offender, Sydney

 

Monday, 24 November 2008

Tom Jones is if fair to say you're not a Rudd fan? The baby bonus was paying people to have children - dumb idea - better to offer paid maternity leave for women who are actually putting something into our economy. He's working hard - don't you worry about that. On the ten billion - So you wouldn't have tried to stimulate the economy out of recession? Have you ever heard what made the great depression great?

Posted by: Ian Clayton, Belmore

Monday, 24 November 2008

I would be a fan of Rudd if I didn't always feel like he's feeding propaganda to the mob. Nothing he has done thus far I would consider worthy of praise. Stimulus is what the reserve bank controls in part with it's interest rate cuts. The $1000 handout for each child pre-xmas is purely so they can blow it on presents and yes stimulate the economy but it doesn't help them through any economic hardship that's possible on the way and what happens next quarter...? another $5 billion in handouts.

Posted by: Tom Jones, Manly

 

Monday, 24 November 2008

my children will not be getting a $1000 worth of presents. i will be investing most of it for them. my eldest will want to move out of home soon so he will need bond money etc. sorry to disappoint. bills will be paid. then a xmas present. no plasma tvs for this family. i dont believe in wasting an opportunity. we have been given one so i am going to use it wisely.

Posted by: Belinda Hummie, New lambton

Monday, 24 November 2008

My Kids won't be getting $1,000 worth of present each either. I won't be investing it for them. They won't get a new computer. I won't pay any bills. We will have a Christmas with the belts tight and no government hand out. But that's fair, I work all week traveling between Newcastle and Sydney to earn above average wages to buy other peoples Christmas presents but just scrap by for my own kids. Merry Christmas my arse!

Posted by: Mark Sinclair, Sydney

Monday, 24 November 2008

well you sir are a tighta#@e and i pity your kids (besides if you can't pay your bills and your working SOOOO much harder than everyone else than you should probably get another job... yours sucks). try putting your 'hard work' into your family a bit more... you're kids will love you more for that than how flash your car is or how many bathrooms you have...:)

Posted by: happy withkev, dapto

Monday, 24 November 2008

good on you mark, i hope to be back where you are next year, i have been on compo for the last three years. after being wrongly diagnosed i finally got the right doctor and had surgery so now i am on the road to recovery. he said i should be back at fulltime work within a year. i have only needed the "handout" this year mark. hopefully next year i will be working my butt off like you. then i will be back travelling between newie & sydney & narrabri &beyond again

Posted by: Belinda Hummie, New lambton

Monday, 24 November 2008

This is where I have an issue - We are entitled to the family bonus...for us its $3000...but we don't need a handout! We manage quite well on our income with three kids, a mortgage and all the normal bills. I am certaintly not spending it on xmas presents or food - that is just stupidity....we will probably stick ours onto the mortgage which is where all our spare cash goes.

Posted by: Concerned Liberal, Minto

Monday, 24 November 2008

i actually think that's a pretty fair call... there are plenty of people with kids who don't 'need' the $1000 per kid but the economy needs to be stimulated and there are only so many options when it comes to deciding how to draw a line in the sand and give money to people on one side of it only... it really doesn't matter which demographic they came up with, some people are going to be unfairly disadvantaged whilsts others are unduly advantaged...

Posted by: happy unionist, dapto

Monday, 24 November 2008

yep concerned liberal i understand that, but i could really do with the helping hand, its been a tough year. it will enable me to get my head above water again. i thought i would be back working by now. not bed ridden still, and its almost december. i have to pay for a cleaner to come in. a gardener. all these things that able bodied people dont have to pay for. i dont get help paying for them because compo helped me in the beginning. hey i am looking forward to a great 2009, for you too :o)

Posted by: Belinda Hummie, New lambton

 

Monday, 24 November 2008

Tim: You stated that he told off the Chinese in Chinese -- AWWWWH!!!! I am sure the Chinese were not shivering and shuddering nor were they concerned what th heck he was saying -- probably thought "Who in the hell does this guy think he is"-- and rightly so. Were you so impressed Tim??? Don't be so naive!!!

Posted by: Angelia Beranek, Sans Souci

Monday, 24 November 2008

how are u "so sure"?

Posted by: tommy garner, sydney

Monday, 24 November 2008

Um, Ange... the point, as you seem to have misplaced it, is that he told Chinese University students the concerns he has with the nation's human rights record. The Chinese were annoyed - people don't usually speak so frankly - especially not on China' soil - and certainly not in Chinese. I don't think you have to look too far to find that alot of commentators see his actions as significant.

Posted by: Tim Brunero, Sydney

 

Monday, 24 November 2008

I'm still waiting for the fast broadband he promised, for the smart country ! - the Telstra technology in my area is so old I can't even get ADSL. And I live in metropolitan Sydney. This is really doing a lot to bring Australia in line with other developed countries. Thanks Kev, Thanks Telstra. Keep up the empty promises. And my kid's school has been without a shade cloth for about 2 years now. Great bureacracy in Dept of Education which has no budget.

Posted by: A P, Caringbah

 

Monday, 24 November 2008

Tim are you sure that you are not a card carrying member of the Labor Party? Rudd has done nothing of practical significance. Yes he has thrown around some of the money that he has received, courtesy of the Coalitions great economic management but when that is gone what is he going to do?. Labor does not have a great track record for running a good economy-so where is the money going to come from?, Perhaps we will all be living on Rudd’s empty rhetoric and shallow symbolism.

Posted by: Desmond Harris, Beacon Hill

Monday, 24 November 2008

Des, can you tell what the Coalition would have done in this situation? Isn't it that they would be doing virtually the same as Labor and spending to stimulate the economy to stop in sliding into Recession? So how can you bag Labor for doing it? Really...

Posted by: Tim Brunero, Sydney

Monday, 24 November 2008

Des, Tim is a member of the anarchy party (if there was one!). You know the type, "anti-everything" "stir up rebellious discussion" "brilliant with 20/20 hindsight". Tim has phrased his question to you, to ignore completely where we would have been if we hadn't changed governments. Eg, Rudd "talked up" inflation...the coalition didn't or wouldn't. Rudd "inherited" a surplus which he is now spending like there is no tomorrow, the coalition would have "spent" more wisely (ie LESS!)

Posted by: Geoff Bolton, Lane Cove

Monday, 24 November 2008

Tim Brunero-The Coalition, had they still been in power, would not have had to do anything different to what they did for the eleven and a half years that they were in Government.They know how to handle the economy in good and in bad times-they proved it.Your hero Rudd is in panic mode-he has gambled the surplus in the typical Labor fashion of trying to buy jobs-it wont work.With the rise and rise of China and India now is not the time to return to the antiquated Union dominated Industrial Relations system -it’s a recipe for disaster-it has brought the gigantic US automotive industry to its knees.

Posted by: Desmond Harris, Beacon Hill

 

Monday, 24 November 2008

Tim: I did not miss the point at all - which planet are you on or need I ask, which party do you belong to? I again reiterate-the Chinese Governmet could care less what Kevin Rudd has to say either in English or Chinese. They are ruling Communists -- the only problem I have with Kevin Rudd is whether he and his party are emulating this type of Government! As far as Commentators finding him significant--the press is so far left-wing they are all applauding him! I am notimpressed at all!

Posted by: Angelia Beranek, Sans Souci