Macquarie Network ::: 2GB | 2CH | LIVENEWS | STREET CORNER | RUGBYLEAGUELIVE | WHAT CAREER | AMAZING AUSTRALIANS :::
Saturday, 10 January 2009

Gillard delivers killer blow to Work Choices with Fair Work bill

25/11/2008 7:00:00 PM.  | AAP & LIVENEWS.com.au

RELATED ARTICLES

LATEST FEATURES

Acting Prime Minister Julia Gillard has sounded the death knell for Work Choices.

She did so by introducing legislation dismantling the previous Howard government's controversial workplace relations regime to parliament, honouring a Labor election promise.

Work Choices had torn apart the core Australian values of mateship and a fair go, Ms Gillard told parliament.

"The philosophy that underpinned Work Choices said, essentially: make your own way in the world; without the comfort of mateship; without the protections afforded by a compassionate society; against the odds deliberately stacked against you," she said.

"No safety net. No rights at work. No cooperation in the workplace to take the nation forward."

Australians had chosen to be true to the ideal of a fair go when they voted to dump Work Choices and sweep Labor into office last November, Ms Gillard said.

The main differences between Fair Work bill and WorkChoices:

   FAIR WORK
   * 10 National Employment Standards, underpinned by safety net of awards which will have a further 10 minimum employment standards.
   * Collective bargaining main vehicle for agreement-making.
   * No new Australian Workplace Agreements or individual arrangements except under common law.
   * Enterprise flexibility clause allows employees earning more than $100,000 to be on arrangement not based on award provided it meets test.
   * New Fair Work Australia body to be one-stop shop industrial agency to replace six bodies including Australian Industrial Relations Commission.
   * Unfair dismissal protection widened to cover casuals and all workers in enterprises with less than 100 employees.
   * Operational reasons no longer acceptable as reason for dismissal.
   * The right to be represented by a union or agent.
   * Access to arbitration to settle intractable disputes or action creating economic harm.

   WORKCHOICES
   * 5 minimum standards as the safety net, everything else negotiable.
   * Individual Australian Workplace Agreements for all employees, collective bargaining only allowed where there's a majority vote.
   * No compulsory arbitration, curbing of Australian Industrial Relations Commission's powers to conciliate and arbitrate disputes.
   * Union right of entry denied in most workplaces.
   * Unfair dismissal protection available only to workers in enterprises with more than 100 employees.
   * Operational reasons could be used by employers to make employees redundant.
   * Establishment of Workplace Authority, Workplace Ombudsman, Fair Pay Commission, Australian Building and Construction Commission.

COMMENTS

Tuesday, 25 November 2008

Presumably the "mateship" the Minister is talking about is compulsory unionism accompanied by non-secret ballots and a boot in the head if you don't toe the line!Remember the bastards who bashed Baldwin?

Posted by: Paul Neri (JWH Party), Australia

 

Tuesday, 25 November 2008

I believe the Opposition should give the bill a clear and fast passage through the parliament. The sooner we start to see the effects of Rudd's policies the better. Problem with this one is (despite all the grandstanding) it's going to be after the next election before the impact is known.

Posted by: Geoff Bolton, Lane Cove

Tuesday, 25 November 2008

best call you ever made 'bolts'... i am, quite frankly, astounded that you could entertain the idea of letting go of WC... perhaps, just perhaps, you may have seen the light, now lets see if that buffoon turnbull and co. have...

Posted by: happy unionist, dapto

Tuesday, 25 November 2008

Bolts: Question without notice! Do you support Labors Bill or oppose it?

Posted by: Paul Keating, Dapto

Tuesday, 25 November 2008

Unionists & Daptos...please re-read my entry. It says nothing about the wisdom or otherwise of the IR changes. It simply implies, get them implemented and then let's see how good they are. Problem is that we'll have to wait till after the next election (which is what Rudd is planning). Think, Unionist...pleeeze!

Posted by: Geoff Bolton, Lane Cove

Tuesday, 25 November 2008

Time to sit down again Bolts. I agree with you.I think the bill was delayed in being produced to ensure the consequences good or bad would not be known until late in the electoral cycle.Having said that Howard intro'd WC with similar timing.I have some concerns over the provisions of union access.The reintroduction of unfair dismissal clauses is to be applauded.In my experience the qual of middle mgt is poor particularly labour planning.This results in many dismissals being by lazy mgrs.

Posted by: Lance Freestone,

Tuesday, 25 November 2008

Bolts: Point of order on Revalance? You evaded the simple question ! ARE you for it or against it. Your position needs to be known then you can't use Hindsight.Looking forward to a simple YES or NO.

Posted by: Paul Keating, Dapto

Tuesday, 25 November 2008

Paul - Bolts is obviously against the new legislation and for workchoices, but as he points out - the people have spoken and we live in a democracy...he is doing the smart thing...you sit back & let people hang themselves & laugh as the show unfolds! Despite his disagreement to the laws, he wants them enacted now so that the people can see first hand how useless the laws are, before the next election so Rudd will get voted out! Geoff, please feel free to correct me if I'm wrong anywhere :-)

Posted by: Concerned Liberal, Minto

Tuesday, 25 November 2008

Con Lib, you are sooooooooooooo right! Dapto, learn from the smarter amongst us! (and learn to spell "relevance"). This is possibly the biggest win for Turnbull.....let it go through parliament unapposed. Then, nobody to blame except Rudd!

Posted by: Geoff Bolton, Lane Cove

Tuesday, 25 November 2008

This means one thing for Australia now. Unemployment at 10% by the middle of next year, as companies large and small shed staff, so they will not be exposed to this financial burden. Use the banana republic and the recession we all had to have, due to Swan and Rudd, to get rid of the dead wood. Out with the new and in with the old laws. I support what they are doing, and the Liberals are doing the right thing to support Rudd, as the last laugh will be in Gillard, Rudd and Swan. Spring clean now.

Posted by: Andy Mac, HK

Tuesday, 25 November 2008

Bolts:Just be careful the Libs don't end up being too smart for their own good.Remember Kyoto and Sorry, Cost you the Election. I agree with you that Rudd is far too clever for the Libs at this point in time.

Posted by: Paul Keating, Dapto

Tuesday, 25 November 2008

dapto, I didn't say "Rudd is far too clever for the Libs at this point in time". Your habit of "verballing" is very similar to Rudd's. I said Rudd "was cunning" - and that's nothing to be proud of, but he does very easily suck in mugs like you.

Posted by: Geoff Bolton, Lane Cove

Tuesday, 25 November 2008

Concerned Liberal:I know Bolts is against the new Bill and loves Workchoices.However the Libs don't have to support the new bill as it will pass the Senate with the Independents and Green Votes.Why would the Libs vote for it? Could it be the reason the majority of voters wanted Work choices gone.So the Libs will sell their Soul to win a few Votes!! Well they had better not forget to pay the Ferryman.

Posted by: Paul Keating, Dapto

 

Tuesday, 25 November 2008

Another mistake by the fools running Australia AWA's are modern way to run a IR laws But The Fools Rudd/ Gillard want the easy way out letting the old fashion unions tell the bloke who pays the wagers what to do. Looks like old way is back under Labour High Unemmployment and higher Taxs paying for the poor people who will be on the uneployment Queue. The people who voted for this dumb mob should hang their heads in shame. Wreaking the ecomomy of Australia.

Posted by: Work Choices Fan Johnstone, Katoomba

Tuesday, 25 November 2008

I wont be hanging my head in shame, quite the opposite. If you think Work choices was fair for workers you must come from another planet or you own a business and now realize you will have to pay your workers what they deserve not what YOU think is fair. Whilst I am not a unionist I do believe they have a roll to play and in regards to high unemployment and tax, your a little premature in reference to THIS labor government.

Posted by: Paul Trood, Southport

 

Tuesday, 25 November 2008

This is what gave the labor party government. About time it was put in place. Bet the big end of town is pi..ed off and I couldn't be happier for them.

Posted by: Paul Trood, Southport

Tuesday, 25 November 2008

Paul, what a short sited statement. What you are saying is clean house now, throw them on the streets while you can, which they will now do. I assume you are on the dole and do not pay tax. Were will the money come to pay for all this social re-engineering by these fools, that like to see people with on their social programs hands outs on the dole? Makes them feel important. Go Comrade Gillard you have my vote.

Posted by: Andy Mac, HK

Tuesday, 25 November 2008

Sorry I am not with you. Throw who on the streets? No not unemployed, constant employment for over 30 years and if you live in Hong Kong I would have paid vastly more tax than you.

Posted by: Paul Trood, Southport

 

Tuesday, 25 November 2008

Gillard delivers killing blow to Work Choices - Should read 'GILLARD DELIVERS KILLING BLOW TO JOBS'

Posted by: Desmond Harris, Beacon Hill

Tuesday, 25 November 2008

Des, I'm with you on this, BUT I really believe the opposition needs to just stand back and let Rudd implement this. 55% of the population gave Rudd a mandate, and that 55% need to see what it means. The opposition will not gain anything by being obstructive. Shazza Burra is already smacking her lips with the increased power comingher way. Let's just let it be and wear the consequences. I'd like to see the new laws implemented well before 2010. Rudd is being cunning by delaying implementation.

Posted by: Geoff (there's only one!) Bolton, Lane Cove

Tuesday, 25 November 2008

"GILLARD DELIVERS KILLING BLOW TO JOBS' now if said quickly it could read something else!!! - PMSL!!

Posted by: What the..., ,, ,

Tuesday, 25 November 2008

Bolts(there are many of you) it is rare of you to show such political nous.A cunning PM eh .First one we have had for a while LOL

Posted by: Lance Freestone,

 

Tuesday, 25 November 2008

Gillard wouldn't know "mateship" if it jumped up and bit her (enormous) bum!

Posted by: Gazzaaaaaaaaaaaaa Benson, Blacktown

 

Tuesday, 25 November 2008

Labor obviously doesn't believe that workers are intelligent enough to make their own minds up. The next cab off the rank will be closing the shop again and bringing back the 'no ticket no start' routine which I think we should all be over with now. I would much prefer to talk to the boss myself and negotiate my own pay increases. I've been doing it for years without the help of a union organiser and ever since I dumped the union I was in (ETU) my work life and home life have both flourished.

Posted by: Brad Johns, Sydney

Tuesday, 25 November 2008

give back your holiday loading, overtime rates and don't put your hand out for maternity when your wife gets pregnant, then you can REALLY know the joys of negotiating YOUR OWN conditions.... how strong is your conviction??? or are you just another who spouts off about 'unions doing nothing' but still reaps the benefits...?

Posted by: happy unionist, dapto

Tuesday, 25 November 2008

Unionist, in the data that Gillard has refused to release, peopel who "had conditions stripped away" actually "traded" them for an increase in the base wage (which feeds things like superannuation). Anyway, the mugs will eventually learn. Lets watch now and see what happens.

Posted by: Geoff Bolton, Lane Cove

Tuesday, 25 November 2008

Sorry happy unionist - Holiday leave loading is a ridiculous concept - it always has been - paying people MORE for being on holidays is just nonsensical. As for overtime - I have strong views about this - I am a HUGE advocate of time in lieu. I have one family member who goes on holidays this friday & doesn't come back until the 19/1/09 - he's so happy. I have another that works 3 x 12.5 days per week & then has 4 days off - she she LOVES it...no overtime for either!

Posted by: Concerned Liberal, Minto

Tuesday, 25 November 2008

and the maternity leave??? or does that actually benefit you??? are you seriously going to tell me you don't accept your holiday loading because of your principles??? or are you JUST SPOUTING OFF???

Posted by: happy unionist, dapto

 

Tuesday, 25 November 2008

Tim Brunero has been unusually quite on this subject; especially since he was working for the advertising company that made the dishonest and deceptive TV commercials against Work Choices during the election. If a private company made such dishonest and misleading commercials; the ACCC would have nailed them; the political arm of the Australian Mafia (the ALP) didn't even get a slap on the wrist. The ACCC are on the Mafia's payroll.

Posted by: Fair Minded Aussie, Australia

 

Tuesday, 25 November 2008

All this hinges on unions doing what they are paid to do. Unfortunately the dropkick rrrrsoles we have now have almost obliterated the entire union movement by their inactions corruption & stupidity. Unless the ACTU weeds out these scumbags the union movement will just keep on fading away.Unfortunately the ACTU has about as much fight in it as a dead wombat.

Posted by: Alex Uren, Luddenham

 

Tuesday, 25 November 2008

It is great to hear this. The term Unfair dismissal means someone getting fired for an unjust reason. How anyone can support legalized injustice is beyond me. But never forget, if the Fiberals ever got back into power they would bring it back, or just openly legalize slavery instead of doing by stealth again. We must never forget what they tried to do, and we must ensure their evil actions are never forgotten. Free the slaves.

Posted by: Graeme Henderson, Darling Downs

Wednesday, 26 November 2008

More crap and delusion from Henderson ! Unfair Dismissal Laws abolished by the Howard Government because they favoured bludgers and thieves. The Unions now control the workplace once again, so watch business and industry grind to a halt through spurious wage claims and vexatious litigation. The parasites of the Labor Party will now do to this country what should have been done to Henderson, years ago !

Posted by: J Youngster, Sydney

 

Tuesday, 25 November 2008

Guillard is right when she said that work choices was the catalyst that provoked the Australian electorate to dump the Howard government. The left wing among this site's posters might have much more issues but this is the one that did the job - in particular, the erosion of the unfair dismissal laws. I am glad that is behind us but I am very concerned re the rest of this law's provisions and the return of union power. As much as the unions should have a role to play, I do not trust their agenda.

Posted by: A Narchy, The Hills

 

Tuesday, 25 November 2008

the right wing argument is always pure speculation. eg future high unemployment etc to hope australia goes down the toilet economically to further their own political aims. very unaustralian. to vote for a party ]liberal] that in the main supports the top end of town.shows their lack of solidarity with normal working class people. and an almost masochistic streak in voting against their own best interests

Posted by: david green, wiley pk

Tuesday, 25 November 2008

Keating lost the working class David when he lost many of their homes for them, and left them on the unemployment heap. The unions lost the majority working class when they worked to benefit themselves and not the workers. Un-Australian is breaking small business back, shipping manufacturing jobs off shore because of compulsory unionism and their demands, and demanding no union card no work. Many working class are awake to Labor and the Unions, they are the same ones who helped get Howard back in for 11 yrs, not all right wing, but we have a two party system, and anything was better than the old Labor, run by the Unions. Looks like they are back. I agree with Geoff, we will wait and see how this HELPS workers.

Posted by: s